Posted by Kentor on 12/19/06 21:48

Hrmmm... hehe this is also a good idea and I guess this would be easier
for me to use at the moment... but in the long run, it would prolly
still be better to use a database...

Geoff Berrow wrote:
> Message-ID: <1166535755.164051.45680@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com> from
> Kentor contained the following:
>
> >I can't include them because they are all different altho similar.... I
> >can't include the area alone because there's code after and before the
> >area that is different in each part. Take a look at the examples I
> >gave...
>
> You are going to have to bite the bullet and rationalise your code. The
> database idea is good but if the data does not change you may simply be
> better of storing the basic data in an array which you then incorporate
> using include(). Your various select boxes can then be generated from
> that array.
>
> --
> Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
> 001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
> 100110001101101111001011100111010101101011

[Back to original message]