| 
	
 | 
 Posted by Jeff Bowman on 12/23/06 02:50 
"-Lost" <spam_ninjaREMOVEME@REMOVEMEcomcast.net> wrote in message  
news:xrqdnQH7wpRo2hbYnZ2dnUVZ_rKvnZ2d@comcast.com... 
 
> Well, people have been misusing tables for quite a few years so why stop  
> now? 
 
HeHeHe...  :-) 
 
 
 
> Seriously, if you are already playing about with CSS, why not just set the  
> height via CSS? 
 
Oh my! Last I heard it wasn't possible--this must be new news? 
 
If there's actually a way to do it, I'd sure be pleased if you could send a  
quick tip... 
 
 
 
> Also, totally off the subject... what in the world is all that extraneous  
> code for?  I also do not understand why for such a small example you  
> appear to be dynamically generating each of eight PNGs.  Weird. 
 
Sure, no problem, I can help you with that  ;-) 
 
It's an ASP.NET server control that I'm building. It enables the web  
application developer to specify various settings--CornerRadius, ForeColor,  
BackColor, etc.--and then the control generates the appropriate CSS and  
images dynamically at runtime. At design time all the developer has to do is  
drag and drop the control onto a form, set a few properties and presto! it  
works--no fiddling with images and such. It's basically a productivity tool. 
 
True, there's extra bandwidth and CPU overhead associated, but given today's  
machine capacities those are relatively minimal and shouldn't be a concern  
for all but the most demanding of applications. And once an image is  
generated for the first time it goes into the server-side memory cache, so  
CPU usage is kept down even further. 
 
All this is well and good, I suppose--I'm pretty handy at server-side logic  
and database stuff, but it's you guys I stand in awe of. The way you're able  
to make a browser sit up and pay attention continually amazes me. And the  
designs--my goodness what designs! 
 
Thanks!
 
[Back to original message] 
 |