Posted by Ed Murphy on 01/04/07 15:51

Damien wrote:

> On a side note (not applicable to OP), in 2005 you can specify the
> order in which articles are processed. But I can't see how that can be
> useful to anyone, since, in general, you would want to process inserts
> in one order (for foreign keys to always work), and deletes in the
> opposite order, surely?

I suppose it could work if (1) the order is reversed for deletes, either
automatically or by request, or (2) cascade-delete triggers are used.

[Back to original message]