Posted by Steve Kass on 06/25/05 06:05
--CELKO-- wrote:
>>>I assume this is a rhetorical loaded question, but someone reading it might be curious. <<
>
>
> Nope. I was hoping to find someone who had worked on a SQL Server
> project in this size range. I see that a lot of these projects are
> expected to grow to x-Terabytes in the future, but are not starting at
> that size in the first year.
>
I asked around about this, and a colleague of mine said he
has a financial data warehouse running SQL Server 2000 that
is currently > 30 TB.
I'll pass your "hoping to find someone" comment to him.
SK
> The reason I am asking is that my first thought is to use Teradata or
> SAND, which were meant for VLDB projects.
>
[Back to original message]
|