Posted by Bill K on 01/12/07 16:04

Steve wrote:
> "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in message
> news:6u8eq21l8mutmtghv9au6ctihi7jmftvd4@4ax.com...
> | I've noticed over the past year that every time I run a search for
> | something...I start rackin up blog hit after blog hit after blog hit.
>
> <snip>
>
> learn to google. better yet, go to the flash site and get TFM !!! i program
> in several languages and have NEVER had the problem you're describing.
> further, i have several technical hobbies as well. each are well covered in
> blogs...in fact, and counter to your pompous-assed attitude and assertions,
> i look forward to getting a blog link as i can be reasonably certain that
> someone has posted links to more informative non-blogged source sites...
>
> arrogant son-of-a-bitch! you have a problem with blogs...fine. I HATE
> DUMBASSES who see fit to post OFF-TOPIC diatribes in nntp groups whos
> context is specific, and specifically NOT for such tirades!
>
> now, on to your quotes...
>
> | Hatter Quotes
> | -------------
> | "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
> | best."
>
> illogically exclusive. certainly the most likely to achieve such a title of
> being the best at a thing are NOT those who work particularly had for it.
> rather, they are those with a natural disposition on inclination toward the
> same.
>
> | "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
> | with it."
>
> your reality seems very distinct to you and not shared by the majority...i
> wonder who is more likely wrong. it is easy to see how the conflict between
> our definition of reality and yours produces such friction as to prompt you
> to hold the 'i'm ok, everyone else is not' attitude.
>
> | "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
>
> illogical equivocation. the quality of one's work gives no indication as to
> whether or not one is actually employed to engage in such work.
>
> | "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
>
> i thought your arrogance was.
>
> | "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
>
> yes...your post forces me to use my filter to 'shut yourself the fuck up'
> since you cannot discipline your own tongue.
>
> | "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
> | bad."
>
> oh you historian! the romans killed jesus, you fucking anti-semite.
>
> | "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
>
> this is about the most coherent quote you've provided. too bad it
> illuminates nothing.
>
> | "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
>
> as is obvious the reason, their reality is vastly different from the world
> in which you delude yourself.
>
> | "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
> | of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
>
> there is no wrong nor right. now as for polite or generally acceptable to
> the masses, i think it is behavior that will earn your art to be known as
> the art definitive of 'perfect ass'.
>
> | "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
> | that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
> | of its relevancy."
>
> and all things outside of the first-cause is likewise. which means that i
> perceive i exist but cannot see any relevance in perceiving that you
> do...and you give little cause that would 'convince others'. after all,
> based on your blathering, narcisistic, and hatefulness behaviour there is
> very little worth in us believing you do exist. that would be a waste of
> time. consider the cost/benefit ratio.
>
> | "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
> | creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
>
> said your boyfriend on new years eve.
>
> | "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
>
> only if you're delusional. reality is based on third-party observations.
> even personal reality is kept in check...tried levitating lately?
>
> | "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
> | they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
> | givin em out for free."
>
> kind of like intellect. while wholly devoid of such, you are even more
> pitiful since you espouse that you do yet parade around, completely obvious
> to all others, without a single marble in your bag.
>
> | "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
> | So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
> | to their merry little mess."
>
> which is why i'm now plonking you.
>
> | "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
> | horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
> | their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
> | sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
> | images burned into their tiny little minds'."
>
> other than considering your 'tiny little' mind, it would be good to start
> with logic in supporting such a claim. first if you intend to use angels for
> support, you should prove god exists and whether or not he has/needs angels.
> further, you'd need to establish they have heads, need blood, and have a
> fetish vented towards implanting unforgettable imagery in ones head.
>
> there is a difference between 'earth shatteringly good' and 'earth
> shatterlingly horrible'. all socially engaged animals curtail partaking of
> the extremes of either as it may get them expelled from the group - spelling
> a most certain doom.
>
> | "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
> | properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
>
> that's a blanket quote you just throw out there to someone whom you've never
> met? you don't know me or anyone else here. i'm sorry you find it necessary
> to project. i do feel sad for you. however, i believe your judging of style
> is merely an overestimation of yourself...you obviously overvalue everything
> you do.
>
> | "Those who record history are those who control history."
>
> illogical equivocation. you certainly do see everyone in a negative light.
> this assertion assumes that motive records history and that the events of
> history have little effect on the story.
>
> | "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
> | endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
> | don't get sent to me...I come for you."
>
> narcisist. futher, prove hell. no matter the result of that endeavor, bring
> it on. i'll spank your ass like a toddler.
>
> | "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
> | tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
>
> ideally, i'd employ diplomacy so as to avoid conflict. here's my quote:
> 'diplomacy - the art of letting others have your way'. since you have no
> such art, or even tact, i can see why this scenario has plagued your mind
> and why you'd consider it an ideal situation.
>
> | "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
> | function?"
>
> i can tell you that none of YOUR processes are functioning!
>
> | "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
> | Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
> | indicates an increase in Webtv users."
>
> you cross-posted. and as with the rest of your reality, every one of these
> groups gets the corner if-and-only-if you come to 'participate' in one of
> them. and your forecast is wrong. you are at 0 points...you cannot get any
> more un-intelligent. what a moron...'down x points and due to increase'...i
> don't think you mean to be so optimistic.
>
> | "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
> | gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
>
> and here's my injunctive relief...
>
> *PLONK*
>
> now, FOAD.

Hatter, you know you've arrived when you inspire so many people to
spend so much time responding to you. Very few people have such power.
Keep up the good work. Just think, if you got them to use their
creative energy solving problems such as Iraq instead diatribes against
you, imagine what could be accomplished.
--
A Hatter Fan

[Back to original message]