Posted by ThePsyko on 01/12/07 20:55

On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve cry
out in news:BoSph.34$US6.2@newsfe02.lga...

>
> "Bill K" <msuwkrull@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1168617886.958531.250160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>|
>| Steve wrote:
>| > "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
>| > message news:6u8eq21l8mutmtghv9au6ctihi7jmftvd4@4ax.com...
>| > | I've noticed over the past year that every time I run a search
>| > | for something...I start rackin up blog hit after blog hit after
>| > | blog hit.
>| >
>| > <snip>
>| >
>| > learn to google. better yet, go to the flash site and get TFM !!! i
> program
>| > in several languages and have NEVER had the problem you're
>| > describing. further, i have several technical hobbies as well. each
>| > are well covered
> in
>| > blogs...in fact, and counter to your pompous-assed attitude and
> assertions,
>| > i look forward to getting a blog link as i can be reasonably
>| > certain
> that
>| > someone has posted links to more informative non-blogged source
>| > sites...
>| >
>| > arrogant son-of-a-bitch! you have a problem with blogs...fine. I
>| > HATE DUMBASSES who see fit to post OFF-TOPIC diatribes in nntp
>| > groups whos context is specific, and specifically NOT for such
>| > tirades!
>| >
>| > now, on to your quotes...
>| >
>| > | Hatter Quotes
>| > | -------------
>| > | "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of
>| > | the best."
>| >
>| > illogically exclusive. certainly the most likely to achieve such a
>| > title
> of
>| > being the best at a thing are NOT those who work particularly had
>| > for
> it.
>| > rather, they are those with a natural disposition on inclination
>| > toward
> the
>| > same.
>| >
>| > | "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped
>| > | you with it."
>| >
>| > your reality seems very distinct to you and not shared by the
> majority...i
>| > wonder who is more likely wrong. it is easy to see how the conflict
> between
>| > our definition of reality and yours produces such friction as to
>| > prompt
> you
>| > to hold the 'i'm ok, everyone else is not' attitude.
>| >
>| > | "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
>| >
>| > illogical equivocation. the quality of one's work gives no
>| > indication as
> to
>| > whether or not one is actually employed to engage in such work.
>| >
>| > | "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
>| >
>| > i thought your arrogance was.
>| >
>| > | "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
>| >
>| > yes...your post forces me to use my filter to 'shut yourself the
>| > fuck
> up'
>| > since you cannot discipline your own tongue.
>| >
>| > | "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
>| > | bad."
>| >
>| > oh you historian! the romans killed jesus, you fucking anti-semite.
>| >
>| > | "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
>| >
>| > this is about the most coherent quote you've provided. too bad it
>| > illuminates nothing.
>| >
>| > | "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
>| >
>| > as is obvious the reason, their reality is vastly different from
>| > the
> world
>| > in which you delude yourself.
>| >
>| > | "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful
>| > | stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to
>| > | further my art?"
>| >
>| > there is no wrong nor right. now as for polite or generally
>| > acceptable
> to
>| > the masses, i think it is behavior that will earn your art to be
>| > known
> as
>| > the art definitive of 'perfect ass'.
>| >
>| > | "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social
>| > | construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to
>| > | convince others of its relevancy."
>| >
>| > and all things outside of the first-cause is likewise. which means
>| > that
> i
>| > perceive i exist but cannot see any relevance in perceiving that
>| > you do...and you give little cause that would 'convince others'.
>| > after all, based on your blathering, narcisistic, and hatefulness
>| > behaviour there
> is
>| > very little worth in us believing you do exist. that would be a
>| > waste of time. consider the cost/benefit ratio.
>| >
>| > | "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and
>| > | start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne
>| > | proper."
>| >
>| > said your boyfriend on new years eve.
>| >
>| > | "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
>| >
>| > only if you're delusional. reality is based on third-party
>| > observations. even personal reality is kept in check...tried
>| > levitating lately?
>| >
>| > | "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
>| > | they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're
>| > | just givin em out for free."
>| >
>| > kind of like intellect. while wholly devoid of such, you are even
>| > more pitiful since you espouse that you do yet parade around,
>| > completely
> obvious
>| > to all others, without a single marble in your bag.
>| >
>| > | "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of
>| > | quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and decided
>| > | at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little mess."
>| >
>| > which is why i'm now plonking you.
>| >
>| > | "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
>| > | horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently
>| > | rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a
>| > | thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have
>| > | the terrible images burned into their tiny little minds'."
>| >
>| > other than considering your 'tiny little' mind, it would be good to
> start
>| > with logic in supporting such a claim. first if you intend to use
>| > angels
> for
>| > support, you should prove god exists and whether or not he
>| > has/needs
> angels.
>| > further, you'd need to establish they have heads, need blood, and
>| > have a fetish vented towards implanting unforgettable imagery in
>| > ones head.
>| >
>| > there is a difference between 'earth shatteringly good' and 'earth
>| > shatterlingly horrible'. all socially engaged animals curtail
>| > partaking
> of
>| > the extremes of either as it may get them expelled from the group -
> spelling
>| > a most certain doom.
>| >
>| > | "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't
>| > | even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
>| >
>| > that's a blanket quote you just throw out there to someone whom
>| > you've
> never
>| > met? you don't know me or anyone else here. i'm sorry you find it
> necessary
>| > to project. i do feel sad for you. however, i believe your judging
>| > of
> style
>| > is merely an overestimation of yourself...you obviously overvalue
> everything
>| > you do.
>| >
>| > | "Those who record history are those who control history."
>| >
>| > illogical equivocation. you certainly do see everyone in a negative
> light.
>| > this assertion assumes that motive records history and that the
>| > events
> of
>| > history have little effect on the story.
>| >
>| > | "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive
>| > | rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending
>| > | horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for you."
>| >
>| > narcisist. futher, prove hell. no matter the result of that
>| > endeavor,
> bring
>| > it on. i'll spank your ass like a toddler.
>| >
>| > | "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
>| > | tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
>| >
>| > ideally, i'd employ diplomacy so as to avoid conflict. here's my
>| > quote: 'diplomacy - the art of letting others have your way'. since
>| > you have no such art, or even tact, i can see why this scenario has
>| > plagued your
> mind
>| > and why you'd consider it an ideal situation.
>| >
>| > | "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
>| > | function?"
>| >
>| > i can tell you that none of YOUR processes are functioning!
>| >
>| > | "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
>| > | Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
>| > | indicates an increase in Webtv users."
>| >
>| > you cross-posted. and as with the rest of your reality, every one
>| > of
> these
>| > groups gets the corner if-and-only-if you come to 'participate' in
>| > one
> of
>| > them. and your forecast is wrong. you are at 0 points...you cannot
>| > get
> any
>| > more un-intelligent. what a moron...'down x points and due to
> increase'...i
>| > don't think you mean to be so optimistic.
>| >
>| > | "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
>| > | gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
>| >
>| > and here's my injunctive relief...
>| >
>| > *PLONK*
>| >
>| > now, FOAD.
>|
>| Hatter, you know you've arrived when you inspire so many people to
>| spend so much time responding to you. Very few people have such
>| power. Keep up the good work. Just think, if you got them to use
>| their creative energy solving problems such as Iraq instead diatribes
>| against you, imagine what could be accomplished.
>| --
>| A Hatter Fan
>
> bill is hatter. pretty sad when one rants, is confronted, and runs and
> hides under a new identity. and, my response took all of about 5
> minutes. i had it to spare while my pc was compiling some code. go
> spew your stupidity somewhere else.
>
> FOAD
>
>
>

lol... You're new to usenet aren't you...

--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7

[Back to original message]