Posted by Max Grrl on 01/12/07 23:06

In article <Xns98B6926407F81LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net>, ThePsyko
<thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:

> On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve cry
> out in news:4LTph.21$9M6.1@newsfe03.lga...
>
> >
> > "ThePsyko" <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns98B683A55608LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> >| On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve
> >| cry out in news:BoSph.34$US6.2@newsfe02.lga...
> >|
> >| >
> >| > "Bill K" <msuwkrull@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >| > news:1168617886.958531.250160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> >| >|
> >| >| Steve wrote:
> >| >| > "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in
> >| >| > message news:6u8eq21l8mutmtghv9au6ctihi7jmftvd4@4ax.com...
> >| >| > | I've noticed over the past year that every time I run a search
> >| >| > | for something...I start rackin up blog hit after blog hit
> >| >| > | after blog hit.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > <snip>
> >| >| >
> >| >| > learn to google. better yet, go to the flash site and get TFM
> >| >| > !!! i
> >| > program
> >| >| > in several languages and have NEVER had the problem you're
> >| >| > describing. further, i have several technical hobbies as well.
> >| >| > each are well covered
> >| > in
> >| >| > blogs...in fact, and counter to your pompous-assed attitude and
> >| > assertions,
> >| >| > i look forward to getting a blog link as i can be reasonably
> >| >| > certain
> >| > that
> >| >| > someone has posted links to more informative non-blogged source
> >| >| > sites...
> >| >| >
> >| >| > arrogant son-of-a-bitch! you have a problem with blogs...fine. I
> >| >| > HATE DUMBASSES who see fit to post OFF-TOPIC diatribes in nntp
> >| >| > groups whos context is specific, and specifically NOT for such
> >| >| > tirades!
> >| >| >
> >| >| > now, on to your quotes...
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | Hatter Quotes
> >| >| > | -------------
> >| >| > | "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one
> >| >| > | of the best."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > illogically exclusive. certainly the most likely to achieve such
> >| >| > a title
> >| > of
> >| >| > being the best at a thing are NOT those who work particularly
> >| >| > had for
> >| > it.
> >| >| > rather, they are those with a natural disposition on inclination
> >| >| > toward
> >| > the
> >| >| > same.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch
> >| >| > | slapped you with it."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > your reality seems very distinct to you and not shared by the
> >| > majority...i
> >| >| > wonder who is more likely wrong. it is easy to see how the
> >| >| > conflict
> >| > between
> >| >| > our definition of reality and yours produces such friction as to
> >| >| > prompt
> >| > you
> >| >| > to hold the 'i'm ok, everyone else is not' attitude.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > illogical equivocation. the quality of one's work gives no
> >| >| > indication as
> >| > to
> >| >| > whether or not one is actually employed to engage in such work.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > i thought your arrogance was.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
> >| >| >
> >| >| > yes...your post forces me to use my filter to 'shut yourself the
> >| >| > fuck
> >| > up'
> >| >| > since you cannot discipline your own tongue.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews,
> >| >| > | my bad."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > oh you historian! the romans killed jesus, you fucking
> >| >| > anti-semite.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n
> >| >| > | such...mmmm..."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > this is about the most coherent quote you've provided. too bad
> >| >| > it illuminates nothing.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > as is obvious the reason, their reality is vastly different from
> >| >| > the
> >| > world
> >| >| > in which you delude yourself.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful
> >| >| > | stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to
> >| >| > | further my art?"
> >| >| >
> >| >| > there is no wrong nor right. now as for polite or generally
> >| >| > acceptable
> >| > to
> >| >| > the masses, i think it is behavior that will earn your art to be
> >| >| > known
> >| > as
> >| >| > the art definitive of 'perfect ass'.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social
> >| >| > | construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to
> >| >| > | convince others of its relevancy."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > and all things outside of the first-cause is likewise. which
> >| >| > means that
> >| > i
> >| >| > perceive i exist but cannot see any relevance in perceiving that
> >| >| > you do...and you give little cause that would 'convince others'.
> >| >| > after all, based on your blathering, narcisistic, and
> >| >| > hatefulness behaviour there
> >| > is
> >| >| > very little worth in us believing you do exist. that would be a
> >| >| > waste of time. consider the cost/benefit ratio.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun
> >| >| > | and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the
> >| >| > | champagne proper."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > said your boyfriend on new years eve.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > only if you're delusional. reality is based on third-party
> >| >| > observations. even personal reality is kept in check...tried
> >| >| > levitating lately?
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think
> >| >| > | that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like
> >| >| > | they're just givin em out for free."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > kind of like intellect. while wholly devoid of such, you are
> >| >| > even more pitiful since you espouse that you do yet parade
> >| >| > around, completely
> >| > obvious
> >| >| > to all others, without a single marble in your bag.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of
> >| >| > | quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and
> >| >| > | decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little
> >| >| > | mess."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > which is why i'm now plonking you.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
> >| >| > | horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they
> >| >| > | violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the
> >| >| > | faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who
> >| >| > | will forever have the terrible images burned into their tiny
> >| >| > | little minds'."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > other than considering your 'tiny little' mind, it would be good
> >| >| > to
> >| > start
> >| >| > with logic in supporting such a claim. first if you intend to
> >| >| > use angels
> >| > for
> >| >| > support, you should prove god exists and whether or not he
> >| >| > has/needs
> >| > angels.
> >| >| > further, you'd need to establish they have heads, need blood,
> >| >| > and have a fetish vented towards implanting unforgettable
> >| >| > imagery in ones head.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > there is a difference between 'earth shatteringly good' and
> >| >| > 'earth shatterlingly horrible'. all socially engaged animals
> >| >| > curtail partaking
> >| > of
> >| >| > the extremes of either as it may get them expelled from the
> >| >| > group -
> >| > spelling
> >| >| > a most certain doom.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't
> >| >| > | even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > that's a blanket quote you just throw out there to someone whom
> >| >| > you've
> >| > never
> >| >| > met? you don't know me or anyone else here. i'm sorry you find
> >| >| > it
> >| > necessary
> >| >| > to project. i do feel sad for you. however, i believe your
> >| >| > judging of
> >| > style
> >| >| > is merely an overestimation of yourself...you obviously
> >| >| > overvalue
> >| > everything
> >| >| > you do.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Those who record history are those who control history."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > illogical equivocation. you certainly do see everyone in a
> >| >| > negative
> >| > light.
> >| >| > this assertion assumes that motive records history and that the
> >| >| > events
> >| > of
> >| >| > history have little effect on the story.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its
> >| >| > | tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and
> >| >| > | unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for
> >| >| > | you."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > narcisist. futher, prove hell. no matter the result of that
> >| >| > endeavor,
> >| > bring
> >| >| > it on. i'll spank your ass like a toddler.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
> >| >| > | tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > ideally, i'd employ diplomacy so as to avoid conflict. here's my
> >| >| > quote: 'diplomacy - the art of letting others have your way'.
> >| >| > since you have no such art, or even tact, i can see why this
> >| >| > scenario has plagued your
> >| > mind
> >| >| > and why you'd consider it an ideal situation.
> >| >| >
> >|>| > | "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
> >| >| > | function?"
> >| >| >
> >| >| > i can tell you that none of YOUR processes are functioning!
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
> >| >| > | Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the
> >| >| > | forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users."
> >| >| >
> >| >| > you cross-posted. and as with the rest of your reality, every
> >| >| > one of
> >| > these
> >| >| > groups gets the corner if-and-only-if you come to 'participate'
> >| >| > in one
> >| > of
> >| >| > them. and your forecast is wrong. you are at 0 points...you
> >| >| > cannot get
> >| > any
> >| >| > more un-intelligent. what a moron...'down x points and due to
> >| > increase'...i
> >| >| > don't think you mean to be so optimistic.
> >| >| >
> >| >| > | "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
> >| >| > | gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
> >| >| >
> >| >| > and here's my injunctive relief...
> >| >| >
> >| >| > *PLONK*
> >| >| >
> >| >| > now, FOAD.
> >| >|
> >| >| Hatter, you know you've arrived when you inspire so many people to
> >| >| spend so much time responding to you. Very few people have such
> >| >| power. Keep up the good work. Just think, if you got them to use
> >| >| their creative energy solving problems such as Iraq instead
> >| >| diatribes against you, imagine what could be accomplished.
> >| >| --
> >| >| A Hatter Fan
> >| >
> >| > bill is hatter. pretty sad when one rants, is confronted, and runs
> >| > and hides under a new identity. and, my response took all of about
> >| > 5 minutes. i had it to spare while my pc was compiling some code.
> >| > go spew your stupidity somewhere else.
> >| >
> >| > FOAD
> >| >
> >| >
> >| >
> >|
> >| lol... You're new to usenet aren't you...
> >|
> >| --
> >| ThePsyko
> >| Public Enemy #7
> >
> > the sock strikes again.
>
> Results 1 - 10 of about 42,600 for author:thepsyko (0.41 seconds)
>
> That's one stinky sock!
>
>
> you have heard of statistical significance,
> > haven't you?
>
> Yes, but apparently you haven't studied it
>
>
> > first, what are the odds that someone favors your vanity,
> > stupidity, and narcissism?
>
> Odd.. most people tell me I'm too modest..
>
>
> > second, that three of them would follow you
> > into one of these three news groups?
>
> "follow" you? I've been here since 1998...
>
> and you call ME vain lol!!!!
>
>
> > third, that they would find your
> > post among a myriad of other posts not made by you?
>
> Yeah, that damn highlighting of new posts... gets me every time
>
>
> > and four, that
> > they all have the same cantor, tone, daftness, and arrogance in the
> > voice of their posts as you?
>
> I posted a total of 7 words (assuming you count "lol" as a word).. you
> got all that from a mere 7 words?
>
>
> > i know you lack such critical thinking
> > skills or familiarity with mathematics in general, however don't
> > assume the rest of us are so gullible.
>
> Sure thing.. as long as you don't assume the rest of us are a paranoid or
> moronic as you.
>
>
>
> >
> > i expect, if you have any honesty in you, you should just respond to
> > this reply with the name 'sockMaster'.
>
> Why would I do that? I can't sock worth shit - just ask anybody lol.. if
> you were 1/4 as smart as you would like to believe you are, you would
> have looked into things before you ran your mouth and proved to everybody
> just what a moron you are.
>
> But hey, welcome to usenet! We could use more clowns like you - it makes
> the days pass that much quicker.

IAWTP!!!50 : )

--
Max Grrl

[Back to original message]