Posted by ThePsyko on 01/12/07 23:14

On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Max Grrl
cry out in news:120120071705421741%maxtheangel@gmail.com...

> In article <4LTph.21$9M6.1@newsfe03.lga>, Steve <no.one@example.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "ThePsyko" <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns98B683A55608LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net...
>> | On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve
>> | cry out in news:BoSph.34$US6.2@newsfe02.lga...
>> |
>> | >
>> | > "Bill K" <msuwkrull@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> | > news:1168617886.958531.250160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>> | >|
>> | >| Steve wrote:
>> | >| > "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote
>> | >| > in message news:6u8eq21l8mutmtghv9au6ctihi7jmftvd4@4ax.com...
>> | >| > | I've noticed over the past year that every time I run a
>> | >| > | search for something...I start rackin up blog hit after blog
>> | >| > | hit after blog hit.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > <snip>
>> | >| >
>> | >| > learn to google. better yet, go to the flash site and get TFM
>> | >| > !!! i
>> | > program
>> | >| > in several languages and have NEVER had the problem you're
>> | >| > describing. further, i have several technical hobbies as well.
>> | >| > each are well covered
>> | > in
>> | >| > blogs...in fact, and counter to your pompous-assed attitude
>> | >| > and
>> | > assertions,
>> | >| > i look forward to getting a blog link as i can be reasonably
>> | >| > certain
>> | > that
>> | >| > someone has posted links to more informative non-blogged
>> | >| > source sites...
>> | >| >
>> | >| > arrogant son-of-a-bitch! you have a problem with blogs...fine.
>> | >| > I HATE DUMBASSES who see fit to post OFF-TOPIC diatribes in
>> | >| > nntp groups whos context is specific, and specifically NOT for
>> | >| > such tirades!
>> | >| >
>> | >| > now, on to your quotes...
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | Hatter Quotes
>> | >| > | -------------
>> | >| > | "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become
>> | >| > | one of the best."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > illogically exclusive. certainly the most likely to achieve
>> | >| > such a title
>> | > of
>> | >| > being the best at a thing are NOT those who work particularly
>> | >| > had for
>> | > it.
>> | >| > rather, they are those with a natural disposition on
>> | >| > inclination toward
>> | > the
>> | >| > same.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch
>> | >| > | slapped you with it."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > your reality seems very distinct to you and not shared by the
>> | > majority...i
>> | >| > wonder who is more likely wrong. it is easy to see how the
>> | >| > conflict
>> | > between
>> | >| > our definition of reality and yours produces such friction as
>> | >| > to prompt
>> | > you
>> | >| > to hold the 'i'm ok, everyone else is not' attitude.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > illogical equivocation. the quality of one's work gives no
>> | >| > indication as
>> | > to
>> | >| > whether or not one is actually employed to engage in such
>> | >| > work.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > i thought your arrogance was.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
>> | >| >
>> | >| > yes...your post forces me to use my filter to 'shut yourself
>> | >| > the fuck
>> | > up'
>> | >| > since you cannot discipline your own tongue.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the
>> | >| > | Jews, my bad."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > oh you historian! the romans killed jesus, you fucking
>> | >| > anti-semite.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n
>> | >| > | such...mmmm..."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > this is about the most coherent quote you've provided. too bad
>> | >| > it illuminates nothing.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > as is obvious the reason, their reality is vastly different
>> | >| > from the
>> | > world
>> | >| > in which you delude yourself.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful
>> | >| > | stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to
>> | >| > | further my art?"
>> | >| >
>> | >| > there is no wrong nor right. now as for polite or generally
>> | >| > acceptable
>> | > to
>> | >| > the masses, i think it is behavior that will earn your art to
>> | >| > be known
>> | > as
>> | >| > the art definitive of 'perfect ass'.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social
>> | >| > | construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability
>> | >| > | to convince others of its relevancy."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > and all things outside of the first-cause is likewise. which
>> | >| > means that
>> | > i
>> | >| > perceive i exist but cannot see any relevance in perceiving
>> | >| > that you do...and you give little cause that would 'convince
>> | >| > others'. after all, based on your blathering, narcisistic, and
>> | >| > hatefulness behaviour there
>> | > is
>> | >| > very little worth in us believing you do exist. that would be
>> | >| > a waste of time. consider the cost/benefit ratio.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun
>> | >| > | and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the
>> | >| > | champagne proper."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > said your boyfriend on new years eve.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > only if you're delusional. reality is based on third-party
>> | >| > observations. even personal reality is kept in check...tried
>> | >| > levitating lately?
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think
>> | >| > | that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like
>> | >| > | they're just givin em out for free."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > kind of like intellect. while wholly devoid of such, you are
>> | >| > even more pitiful since you espouse that you do yet parade
>> | >| > around, completely
>> | > obvious
>> | >| > to all others, without a single marble in your bag.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of
>> | >| > | quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and
>> | >| > | decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little
>> | >| > | mess."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > which is why i'm now plonking you.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth
>> | >| > | shatteringly horrible it makes the angels scream in terror
>> | >| > | as they violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying
>> | >| > | into the faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified
>> | >| > | children, who will forever have the terrible images burned
>> | >| > | into their tiny little minds'."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > other than considering your 'tiny little' mind, it would be
>> | >| > good to
>> | > start
>> | >| > with logic in supporting such a claim. first if you intend to
>> | >| > use angels
>> | > for
>> | >| > support, you should prove god exists and whether or not he
>> | >| > has/needs
>> | > angels.
>> | >| > further, you'd need to establish they have heads, need blood,
>> | >| > and have a fetish vented towards implanting unforgettable
>> | >| > imagery in ones head.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > there is a difference between 'earth shatteringly good' and
>> | >| > 'earth shatterlingly horrible'. all socially engaged animals
>> | >| > curtail partaking
>> | > of
>> | >| > the extremes of either as it may get them expelled from the
>> | >| > group -
>> | > spelling
>> | >| > a most certain doom.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you
>> | >| > | can't even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own
>> | >| > | efforts."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > that's a blanket quote you just throw out there to someone
>> | >| > whom you've
>> | > never
>> | >| > met? you don't know me or anyone else here. i'm sorry you find
>> | >| > it
>> | > necessary
>> | >| > to project. i do feel sad for you. however, i believe your
>> | >| > judging of
>> | > style
>> | >| > is merely an overestimation of yourself...you obviously
>> | >| > overvalue
>> | > everything
>> | >| > you do.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Those who record history are those who control history."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > illogical equivocation. you certainly do see everyone in a
>> | >| > negative
>> | > light.
>> | >| > this assertion assumes that motive records history and that
>> | >| > the events
>> | > of
>> | >| > history have little effect on the story.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its
>> | >| > | tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and
>> | >| > | unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for
>> | >| > | you."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > narcisist. futher, prove hell. no matter the result of that
>> | >| > endeavor,
>> | > bring
>> | >| > it on. i'll spank your ass like a toddler.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250
>> | >| > | kiloton tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > ideally, i'd employ diplomacy so as to avoid conflict. here's
>> | >| > my quote: 'diplomacy - the art of letting others have your
>> | >| > way'. since you have no such art, or even tact, i can see why
>> | >| > this scenario has plagued your
>> | > mind
>> | >| > and why you'd consider it an ideal situation.
>> | >| >
>> |>| > | "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
>> | >| > | function?"
>> | >| >
>> | >| > i can tell you that none of YOUR processes are functioning!
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on
>> | >| > | stupid. Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and
>> | >| > | the forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users."
>> | >| >
>> | >| > you cross-posted. and as with the rest of your reality, every
>> | >| > one of
>> | > these
>> | >| > groups gets the corner if-and-only-if you come to
>> | >| > 'participate' in one
>> | > of
>> | >| > them. and your forecast is wrong. you are at 0 points...you
>> | >| > cannot get
>> | > any
>> | >| > more un-intelligent. what a moron...'down x points and due to
>> | > increase'...i
>> | >| > don't think you mean to be so optimistic.
>> | >| >
>> | >| > | "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
>> | >| > | gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
>> | >| >
>> | >| > and here's my injunctive relief...
>> | >| >
>> | >| > *PLONK*
>> | >| >
>> | >| > now, FOAD.
>> | >|
>> | >| Hatter, you know you've arrived when you inspire so many people
>> | >| to spend so much time responding to you. Very few people have
>> | >| such power. Keep up the good work. Just think, if you got them
>> | >| to use their creative energy solving problems such as Iraq
>> | >| instead diatribes against you, imagine what could be
>> | >| accomplished. --
>> | >| A Hatter Fan
>> | >
>> | > bill is hatter. pretty sad when one rants, is confronted, and
>> | > runs and hides under a new identity. and, my response took all of
>> | > about 5 minutes. i had it to spare while my pc was compiling some
>> | > code. go spew your stupidity somewhere else.
>> | >
>> | > FOAD
>> | >
>> | >
>> | >
>> |
>> | lol... You're new to usenet aren't you...
>
> Obviously, Babe. : )
>> |
>> | --
>> | ThePsyko
>> | Public Enemy #7
>>
>> the sock strikes again.
>
> LOL, Psycho's not Hat's sock - nor anyone else's.
>
>> you have heard of statistical significance, haven't
>> you? first, what are the odds that someone favors your vanity,
>> stupidity, and narcissism? second, that three of them would follow
>> you into one of these three news groups?
>
> I've got an idea - why don't you take a looky-look at all the froups
> this thread is xposted to, hmmm? Considering that there's at least 4,
> that's quite a few pools to draw peeps from.
>
> Further, when you consider the fact that most of these peeps have been
> on usenet for quite some time, I'd think it's pretty fucking logical
> to come to the conclusion that pretty much everybody KNOWS pretty much
> everybody.
>
> But for the record, the players are from the froups as follows
> (though, next time, why don't you just Google the chit to see if they
> ARE socks before you start ASSuming shit, hmmm?
>
> Psycho: alt.hackers.malicious, alt.2600 (I think), alt.php (I think)
> Hat: All of the above
> Me: ADG, AHM, though I often lurk at AMF
>
> For the record, I've known Hat for about 2 years, and Psycho about
> what? 6 months? And no one who's actually lurked for longer than a
> week would EVER assume that the two are anything close to even being
> friendly, much less "socks" of the other, LOL.
>
>> third, that they would find your post among a
>> myriad of other posts not made by you? and four, that they all have
>> the same cantor, tone, daftness, and arrogance in the voice of their
>> posts as you? i know you lack such critical thinking skills or
>> familiarity with mathematics in general, however don't assume the
>> rest of us are so gullible.
>
> AFAIK, the syntax you're referring to would be considered a "language"
> common to those who hack and/or are "netters."LOL, I'm by no means a
> hacker, but I speak the "language" for the most part . . . it's kinda
> how you fit in in the groups.
>
> And if you haven't figured it out yet - most hackers are fucking
> arrogant as hell - prolly because they know they can fuck up your
> computer without breaking a sweat. But, "netters" are pretty fucking
> arrogant, too.
>>
>> i expect, if you have any honesty in you, you should just respond to
>> this reply with the name 'sockMaster'.
>
> HTH!!
>
> *sigh*
>
> I know, I know . . . I MUST be a sock, too, right? ; )
>>
>>
>

yeah but you're a cute sock lol.. now.. where do I put my toes IYKWIM?!??
:)

--
ThePsyko
Public Enemy #7

[Back to original message]