Posted by Max Grrl on 01/12/07 23:22

In article <Xns98B69B3BC73ECLifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net>, ThePsyko
<thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote:

> On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Max Grrl
> cry out in news:120120071705421741%maxtheangel@gmail.com...
>
> > In article <4LTph.21$9M6.1@newsfe03.lga>, Steve <no.one@example.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> "ThePsyko" <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Xns98B683A55608LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net...
> >> | On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve
> >> | cry out in news:BoSph.34$US6.2@newsfe02.lga...
> >> |
> >> | >
> >> | > "Bill K" <msuwkrull@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> | > news:1168617886.958531.250160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> >> | >|
> >> | >| Steve wrote:
> >> | >| > "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote
> >> | >| > in message news:6u8eq21l8mutmtghv9au6ctihi7jmftvd4@4ax.com...
> >> | >| > | I've noticed over the past year that every time I run a
> >> | >| > | search for something...I start rackin up blog hit after blog
> >> | >| > | hit after blog hit.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > <snip>
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > learn to google. better yet, go to the flash site and get TFM
> >> | >| > !!! i
> >> | > program
> >> | >| > in several languages and have NEVER had the problem you're
> >> | >| > describing. further, i have several technical hobbies as well.
> >> | >| > each are well covered
> >> | > in
> >> | >| > blogs...in fact, and counter to your pompous-assed attitude
> >> | >| > and
> >> | > assertions,
> >> | >| > i look forward to getting a blog link as i can be reasonably
> >> | >| > certain
> >> | > that
> >> | >| > someone has posted links to more informative non-blogged
> >> | >| > source sites...
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > arrogant son-of-a-bitch! you have a problem with blogs...fine.
> >> | >| > I HATE DUMBASSES who see fit to post OFF-TOPIC diatribes in
> >> | >| > nntp groups whos context is specific, and specifically NOT for
> >> | >| > such tirades!
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > now, on to your quotes...
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | Hatter Quotes
> >> | >| > | -------------
> >> | >| > | "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become
> >> | >| > | one of the best."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > illogically exclusive. certainly the most likely to achieve
> >> | >| > such a title
> >> | > of
> >> | >| > being the best at a thing are NOT those who work particularly
> >> | >| > had for
> >> | > it.
> >> | >| > rather, they are those with a natural disposition on
> >> | >| > inclination toward
> >> | > the
> >> | >| > same.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch
> >> | >| > | slapped you with it."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > your reality seems very distinct to you and not shared by the
> >> | > majority...i
> >> | >| > wonder who is more likely wrong. it is easy to see how the
> >> | >| > conflict
> >> | > between
> >> | >| > our definition of reality and yours produces such friction as
> >> | >| > to prompt
> >> | > you
> >> | >| > to hold the 'i'm ok, everyone else is not' attitude.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > illogical equivocation. the quality of one's work gives no
> >> | >| > indication as
> >> | > to
> >> | >| > whether or not one is actually employed to engage in such
> >> | >| > work.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > i thought your arrogance was.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > yes...your post forces me to use my filter to 'shut yourself
> >> | >| > the fuck
> >> | > up'
> >> | >| > since you cannot discipline your own tongue.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the
> >> | >| > | Jews, my bad."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > oh you historian! the romans killed jesus, you fucking
> >> | >| > anti-semite.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n
> >> | >| > | such...mmmm..."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > this is about the most coherent quote you've provided. too bad
> >> | >| > it illuminates nothing.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > as is obvious the reason, their reality is vastly different
> >> | >| > from the
> >> | > world
> >> | >| > in which you delude yourself.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful
> >> | >| > | stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to
> >> | >| > | further my art?"
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > there is no wrong nor right. now as for polite or generally
> >> | >| > acceptable
> >> | > to
> >> | >| > the masses, i think it is behavior that will earn your art to
> >> | >| > be known
> >> | > as
> >> | >| > the art definitive of 'perfect ass'.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social
> >> | >| > | construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability
> >> | >| > | to convince others of its relevancy."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > and all things outside of the first-cause is likewise. which
> >> | >| > means that
> >> | > i
> >> | >| > perceive i exist but cannot see any relevance in perceiving
> >> | >| > that you do...and you give little cause that would 'convince
> >> | >| > others'. after all, based on your blathering, narcisistic, and
> >> | >| > hatefulness behaviour there
> >> | > is
> >> | >| > very little worth in us believing you do exist. that would be
> >> | >| > a waste of time. consider the cost/benefit ratio.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun
> >> | >| > | and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the
> >> | >| > | champagne proper."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > said your boyfriend on new years eve.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > only if you're delusional. reality is based on third-party
> >> | >| > observations. even personal reality is kept in check...tried
> >> | >| > levitating lately?
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think
> >> | >| > | that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like
> >> | >| > | they're just givin em out for free."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > kind of like intellect. while wholly devoid of such, you are
> >> | >| > even more pitiful since you espouse that you do yet parade
> >> | >| > around, completely
> >> | > obvious
> >> | >| > to all others, without a single marble in your bag.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of
> >> | >| > | quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and
> >> | >| > | decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little
> >> | >| > | mess."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > which is why i'm now plonking you.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth
> >> | >| > | shatteringly horrible it makes the angels scream in terror
> >> | >| > | as they violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying
> >> | >| > | into the faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified
> >> | >| > | children, who will forever have the terrible images burned
> >> | >| > | into their tiny little minds'."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > other than considering your 'tiny little' mind, it would be
> >> | >| > good to
> >> | > start
> >> | >| > with logic in supporting such a claim. first if you intend to
> >> | >| > use angels
> >> | > for
> >> | >| > support, you should prove god exists and whether or not he
> >> | >| > has/needs
> >> | > angels.
> >> | >| > further, you'd need to establish they have heads, need blood,
> >> | >| > and have a fetish vented towards implanting unforgettable
> >> | >| > imagery in ones head.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > there is a difference between 'earth shatteringly good' and
> >> | >| > 'earth shatterlingly horrible'. all socially engaged animals
> >> | >| > curtail partaking
> >> | > of
> >> | >| > the extremes of either as it may get them expelled from the
> >> | >| > group -
> >> | > spelling
> >> | >| > a most certain doom.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you
> >> | >| > | can't even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own
> >> | >| > | efforts."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > that's a blanket quote you just throw out there to someone
> >> | >| > whom you've
> >> | > never
> >> | >| > met? you don't know me or anyone else here. i'm sorry you find
> >> | >| > it
> >> | > necessary
> >> | >| > to project. i do feel sad for you. however, i believe your
> >> | >| > judging of
> >> | > style
> >> | >| > is merely an overestimation of yourself...you obviously
> >> | >| > overvalue
> >> | > everything
> >> | >| > you do.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Those who record history are those who control history."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > illogical equivocation. you certainly do see everyone in a
> >> | >| > negative
> >> | > light.
> >> | >| > this assertion assumes that motive records history and that
> >> | >| > the events
> >> | > of
> >> | >| > history have little effect on the story.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its
> >> | >| > | tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and
> >> | >| > | unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for
> >> | >| > | you."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > narcisist. futher, prove hell. no matter the result of that
> >> | >| > endeavor,
> >> | > bring
> >> | >| > it on. i'll spank your ass like a toddler.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250
> >> | >| > | kiloton tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > ideally, i'd employ diplomacy so as to avoid conflict. here's
> >> | >| > my quote: 'diplomacy - the art of letting others have your
> >> | >| > way'. since you have no such art, or even tact, i can see why
> >> | >| > this scenario has plagued your
> >> | > mind
> >> | >| > and why you'd consider it an ideal situation.
> >> | >| >
> >> |>| > | "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
> >> | >| > | function?"
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > i can tell you that none of YOUR processes are functioning!
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on
> >> | >| > | stupid. Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and
> >> | >| > | the forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users."
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > you cross-posted. and as with the rest of your reality, every
> >> | >| > one of
> >> | > these
> >> | >| > groups gets the corner if-and-only-if you come to
> >> | >| > 'participate' in one
> >> | > of
> >> | >| > them. and your forecast is wrong. you are at 0 points...you
> >> | >| > cannot get
> >> | > any
> >> | >| > more un-intelligent. what a moron...'down x points and due to
> >> | > increase'...i
> >> | >| > don't think you mean to be so optimistic.
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > | "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
> >> | >| > | gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > and here's my injunctive relief...
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > *PLONK*
> >> | >| >
> >> | >| > now, FOAD.
> >> | >|
> >> | >| Hatter, you know you've arrived when you inspire so many people
> >> | >| to spend so much time responding to you. Very few people have
> >> | >| such power. Keep up the good work. Just think, if you got them
> >> | >| to use their creative energy solving problems such as Iraq
> >> | >| instead diatribes against you, imagine what could be
> >> | >| accomplished. --
> >> | >| A Hatter Fan
> >> | >
> >> | > bill is hatter. pretty sad when one rants, is confronted, and
> >> | > runs and hides under a new identity. and, my response took all of
> >> | > about 5 minutes. i had it to spare while my pc was compiling some
> >> | > code. go spew your stupidity somewhere else.
> >> | >
> >> | > FOAD
> >> | >
> >> | >
> >> | >
> >> |
> >> | lol... You're new to usenet aren't you...
> >
> > Obviously, Babe. : )
> >> |
> >> | --
> >> | ThePsyko
> >> | Public Enemy #7
> >>
> >> the sock strikes again.
> >
> > LOL, Psycho's not Hat's sock - nor anyone else's.
> >
> >> you have heard of statistical significance, haven't
> >> you? first, what are the odds that someone favors your vanity,
> >> stupidity, and narcissism? second, that three of them would follow
> >> you into one of these three news groups?
> >
> > I've got an idea - why don't you take a looky-look at all the froups
> > this thread is xposted to, hmmm? Considering that there's at least 4,
> > that's quite a few pools to draw peeps from.
> >
> > Further, when you consider the fact that most of these peeps have been
> > on usenet for quite some time, I'd think it's pretty fucking logical
> > to come to the conclusion that pretty much everybody KNOWS pretty much
> > everybody.
> >
> > But for the record, the players are from the froups as follows
> > (though, next time, why don't you just Google the chit to see if they
> > ARE socks before you start ASSuming shit, hmmm?
> >
> > Psycho: alt.hackers.malicious, alt.2600 (I think), alt.php (I think)
> > Hat: All of the above
> > Me: ADG, AHM, though I often lurk at AMF
> >
> > For the record, I've known Hat for about 2 years, and Psycho about
> > what? 6 months? And no one who's actually lurked for longer than a
> > week would EVER assume that the two are anything close to even being
> > friendly, much less "socks" of the other, LOL.
> >
> >> third, that they would find your post among a
> >> myriad of other posts not made by you? and four, that they all have
> >> the same cantor, tone, daftness, and arrogance in the voice of their
> >> posts as you? i know you lack such critical thinking skills or
> >> familiarity with mathematics in general, however don't assume the
> >> rest of us are so gullible.
> >
> > AFAIK, the syntax you're referring to would be considered a "language"
> > common to those who hack and/or are "netters."LOL, I'm by no means a
> > hacker, but I speak the "language" for the most part . . . it's kinda
> > how you fit in in the groups.
> >
> > And if you haven't figured it out yet - most hackers are fucking
> > arrogant as hell - prolly because they know they can fuck up your
> > computer without breaking a sweat. But, "netters" are pretty fucking
> > arrogant, too.
> >>
> >> i expect, if you have any honesty in you, you should just respond to
> >> this reply with the name 'sockMaster'.
> >
> > HTH!!
> >
> > *sigh*
> >
> > I know, I know . . . I MUST be a sock, too, right? ; )
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> yeah but you're a cute sock lol.. now.. where do I put my toes IYKWIM?!??
> :)

Hmmmm . . . I'd say "anywhere you want to," Babe! : )
Um . . . but this time you ARE gonna trim those talons, right? ; )

--
Max Grrl

[Back to original message]