|
Posted by pmennen on 01/14/07 05:25
Thanks for the responses.
I liked Roy's suggestion best because it was very simple and seemed
to work for me, both with IE and FireFox. No need to worry about
JavaScript yet it seems.
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> BTW I would not put an image 1280 pixels high on the web. Firstly, it
> will be a very large download for dialup, and secondly I'm running 1280
> x 1024 on my monitor which is higher than most and I would not be able
> to view your image without scrolling! Resample to something smaller than
> 600!
Yes, the images are large (1/2 Mbyte) and I have several, so it
won't be great with dialup. But in this case it is the only way to
go. If the images could tolerate subsampling, I wouldn't have been
asking this question to begin with. I'm demonstrating what something
will look like on a particular computer, so it has to be exact.
~Paul
[Back to original message]
|