Posted by Roy A. on 01/14/07 05:36

pmennen skrev:
> Thanks for the responses.
> I liked Roy's suggestion best because it was very simple and seemed
> to work for me, both with IE and FireFox. No need to worry about
> JavaScript yet it seems.
>
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>
> > BTW I would not put an image 1280 pixels high on the web. Firstly, it
> > will be a very large download for dialup, and secondly I'm running 1280
> > x 1024 on my monitor which is higher than most and I would not be able
> > to view your image without scrolling! Resample to something smaller than
> > 600!
>
> Yes, the images are large (1/2 Mbyte) and I have several, so it
> won't be great with dialup. But in this case it is the only way to
> go. If the images could tolerate subsampling, I wouldn't have been
> asking this question to begin with. I'm demonstrating what something
> will look like on a particular computer, so it has to be exact.

I quest it was a reason you used png insted of quality redused jpg.

[Back to original message]