Posted by Steve on 01/15/07 03:39

"The Secretary of HomIntern" <YkR4N53909@WòéM.6Ró> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.01.15.01.54.56.104463@bisexuals.for.lgbt.freedom...
| On Sun, 14 Jan 2007 19:18:23 -0600, Steve k'lamed:
| > "Pinku-Sensei" wrote...
| > | Max Grrl wrote:
| > | > ThePsyko wrote:
| > | >> On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard
Onideus
| > | >> Mad Hatter cry out...
| > |
| > | >> > So I guess the question now is...who wants to nominate Stevie The
| > | >> > Wonder Retard for CNotM?
| > |
| > | You forgot to tell them to include AUK in the groups line when they
did.
| > | Since you can't nominate candidates yourself, you're going to have to
| > | give better instructions to those who can.
| > |
| > | >> I think the simple act of assuming you and I are the same person is
| > | >> definitely worthy of a "clueless" award of any magnitude..
| > |
| > | That /is/ pretty st00pid. Anyone with a clue would know better. I
| > | guess Hatter hasn't been poasting to alt.php long enough for the
| > | regulars there (or alt.atheism) to figure that out.
| >
| > not stupid really. i was overly optimistic in assuming there were fewer
| > kooks in the world so self-absorbed as omh. in my hopeful perspective
and
| > seeing other responses supporting the original kook, i assumed it was a
| > sock. likewise, i felt (and still do) that for the conversation at hand,
| > an attempt to verify this assumption by inspecting headers simply was/is
| > not a very good use of my time. now, if that is 'st00pid', i'm sorry no
| > one understands. however, i don't care. when i'm in a news group aimed
at
| > harboring stupidity or asinine and egotistical content, i may become
more
| > interested and take the time. as it is, the ng i'm responding from is
| > geared to solving programmatic problems...not listening to or responding
| > to blog-fashioned rants of personal opinion that have nothing to do with
| > really much of anything other than the action of doing so.
| >
| > as for the 'award', i'd nominate omh. by shear and utter demonstration
of
| > narcisism and lack of any measure of logical response to his assertions
i
| > commented on, he has the corner on the definition of kook. he's a
shoe-in.
| > i can't help but feel, though, that those relishing such awards
| > (nominations and conveyences) that it is an exercise of mental
| > masturbation on a monumental scale more closely resembling public, forum
| > sponsered group sex. what purpose does this serve and what good is
| > derived? i'm sure it is better understood by the other 12 yr. old
'l33ts'
| > from alt.2600 - omh being its pennicle mascot. as for we more matured
| > useneters, we simply have better and more productive ways to spend our
| > time.
| >
| > cheers
|
| OMH is already a multiple award-winning k00k, and giving him anymore
| awards only feeds his ego. You, however, are new blood, and I think a
| CNotM nomination, as well as a Unabomber Surprise, would look good on
| you. Sadly, I can't give you either nom, as I've already used them up
| (on equally-as-worthy candidates, mind), but I can at least make
| suggestions.

now see...that's funny. ;^)

since i'm obviously new to such 'awards', perhaps you'd be so kind as to
de-achronymize them and give a brief description. that may provide me with a
few more chuckles.

cheers.

[Back to original message]