Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 01/15/07 18:12

Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jonathan N. Little)
>
>> Arjen wrote:
>>
>>> Next button :-p
>> It's on the browser, and it is not valid unless your have hit the back
>> button first!
>
> For browsers that support it there is also
>
> 6.12 Link types
> http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/types.html#type-links
>
> But most likely that's not what the OP wants ...

I like them and use them, but OP's UA is

UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR
1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)

I am sure he is totally unaware of their existence and therefore did not
mention them. Also PITA to statically code them, server-side CMS it is a
breeze...
>
>>> This might be debatable but personally I like a print button on a page
>>> that needs to be printed (confirmaton page or route planner etc)
>> 1) requires JavaScript enabled (it I put one on a page I firstly insert
>> "link|button" with JavaScript so it will not appear when not available
>> and secondly make not printable in CSS)
>
> It also requires a browser that supports JS-invoked printing.
> Most do, but not all.
>

Hence my opposition to the idea.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

[Back to original message]