|
|
Posted by Steve on 01/16/07 16:21
"J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> wrote in message
news:5149sqF1ic3t0U1@mid.individual.net...
| Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
| > On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:39:55 +0100, "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net>
| > wrote:
|
| >>> Well considering the fact that I just tested it out on Cluster Knoppix
| >>> which runs off OpenMosix and I also tested it out on Knoppix which
| >>> runs off Debian GNU/Linux and they both work fuckin peachy...yeah, I'd
| >>> say yer full of shit, Cupcake.
| >
| >> And the architecture was? We have the following official Debians
| >>
| >> Debian GNU/Linux Alpha
| >> Debian GNU/Linux Arm
| >> Debian GNU/Linux HPPA
| >> Debian GNU/Linux i386
| >> Debian GNU/Linux ia64
| >> Debian GNU/Linux m68k
| >> Debian GNU/Linux MIPS
| >> Debian GNU/Linux MIPSEL (same as MIPS but little endian)
| >> Debian GNU/Linux PowerPC
| >> Debian GNU/Linux Sparc
| >>
| >> Official Knoppix are
| >>
| >> KNOPPIX i386
| >>
| >>
| >> For i386 you can use the x86 flash plug-in, but you CAN'T use it for
Alpha,
| >> Arm, HPPA, ia64, m68k, MIPS, MIPSEL, PowerPC or Sparc.
| >>
| >> I have 3 desktop machines here, all with different architectures, but
the same
| >> GNU/Linux distribution, I know what I'm talking about, you do just
bable about
| >> things you don't understand.
| >>
| >>
| >> Here are the links that describes the architectures, as I doubt you
will
| >> manage to find any information about those in any other way.
| >>
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HPPA
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I386
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ia64
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M68k
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_architecture
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerPC
| >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparc
| >>
| >> I hope you will understand that they have different instruction sets
and
| >> endians and none of them are compatible with each other.
| >
| > Like they say on the WoW forums...
| >
| > SCREEN SHOT OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN
|
| Okey, here you have screen shot of a site you say you have looked at the
| source (you get that if you press [Ctrl]-[F3] in opera):
|
| Opera PowerPC:
| http://i13.tinypic.com/2e5hxmu.png
|
| Opera Sparc:
| http://i10.tinypic.com/2qlg6s8.png
|
| But you will still not believe, as you think you can run everything on
your
| computer, so please run this binary and give a screenshot
|
http://www.bernstein-plus-sons.com/cgi-bin/yaya/decomp.cgi/software/RasMol_2.7.2.1.1.MAC/RasMac_PPC_32BIT.bin
|
|
| > If you've got boxen set up with all these different Linux distros,
|
| You still not don't understand, I have _ONE DISTRIBUTION_ installed on
| machines with different architecture. As the important part here is that
there
| isn't any real flash plug-in for other architectures than x86 when it
comes to
| GNU/Linux, regardless of distribution.
|
|
| > well let's see some screen shots of this supposedly broken Flash...or
| > is a screen capture too hard for a retard like you to figure out?
| >
| > Also keep in mind that for every screen shot you put up...I'm gonna
| > repost em to the Linux froups to ask for confirmation (cause ten to
| > one says your stupid ass just doesn't know how to set it up
| > correctly).
|
| Go ahead, but keep in mind to mention that the screenshots are using
GNU/Linux
| PowerPC and GNU/Linux Sparc with the official plug-in from Adobe. But I
know,
| you will fail to remember that, for it would make you seem to like a fool,
as
| there aren't any official plug-in from Adobe for PowerPC or Sparc or most
of
| the other architectures I have all the time mentioned.
|
| You could also ask Adobe themselves
| http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/contact.html
|
|
| > Also, why don't you try explaining to everyone WHY you would want to
| > use a Linux distro with an architecture that DIDN'T support Flash
| > (ASSuming of course your ASSumptions are even rooted in reality).
|
| Why would people want to have a Ferrari? As they want something better
than
| the old T-Ford. All GNU/Linux architectures supports Flash, but Adobe
don't
| support any other architecture than x86. Adobe don't support more than two
x86
| based operating systems, compare that to the Mozilla projects that
supports
| far more operating systems than Adobe. Still, Flash sites limits access
and
| will never provide as broad user base as a well written HTML site will.
|
| I stand firmly at my original statement, you still haven't managed to come
| with something that would change the facts, all you have been able to do
is
| act like a kid and insult people when you can't "win".
so now you have met OMH.
btw, when he said earlier that he needed someone to translate retard to
english...he really meant that as english to retard - so he could understand
it.
look at his other posts here. he likes to bitch. when he doesn't understand
something, it is because of someone else's lack of intellect or
understanding. when he is shown to be stupid, he obsesses and throws up
strawmen...or just outright lies.
all in all, his behavior just confirms what i've held for a long time.
anyone who has to go on and on about how smart they are or how much better
they are than anyone else is typically more dense than others and have
self-esteem problems as a result - for which they overcompensate by being
perfect asses. those who are smarter or better than others in a particular
endeavor rarely speak of themselves as such. instead, they can't get a word
in edge-wise because others are boasting for them.
aho, i've seen your involvement in alt.php for a number of years...so i'll
boast for you. you know what you are talking about. you are helpful and
thoughful to others. you produce solutions for common and obscure problems
alike that demonstrate your abilities and show you are well ahead of the
curve.
now, i won't waste my time in listening for anyone to ever say any of that
on OMH's behalf.
cheers.
[Back to original message]
|