|
Posted by Steve on 01/18/07 14:59
"Jeckyl" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:12quoajb762v51@corp.supernews.com...
|> Just because a site has the word BLOG in it doesn't mean that it's a
| > blog, you stupid fucking drooler.
|
| Amazing .. that's just what I said (apart from the stupid fucking drooler
| part, you are mor ethan capable of providing profanity). Yes. . it will
| remove some sites that aren't blogs, and will still show som sites that
are.
| But it will get rid of a large number of blogs and still leave a good
number
| of sites that ar enot blogs. I'm just suggesting a very simple way of
| filtering a large number of blog sites (seeing you don't like to have them
| in your search results).
|
| > And since search results are based highly off LINKING, well if you've
got
| > a REALLY great resource and
| > half the fuckin blogs on the east coast are linkin to it...GUESS WHAT!
| > DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM!
|
| I'm not sure what this amzing 'GUESS WHAT!' is .. if it is because you
think
| that means the resource mentioned won't be listed, then that's just wrong.
| Unless the resource itself has the word 'blog' in it, it won't be lost
from
| the results. It doesn't matter how many blog sites link to it.
|
| > even *I* don't go around claiming to KNOW EVERYTHING.
|
| Firstly, I don't claim I do .. maybe it just seems that way to you because
| of how little you know. I guess you're just in awe of someone who has
| knowledge and experience .. you just don't know how to handle it, so you
| throw insults instead. Sad.
|
| And .. well, let's face it.. its incredibly obvious that you know very
| little, so any claims that you do would be laughable.
jeckyl, notice that he has yet to reply to his premultiplied alpha post
where he flamed four people, particularly you, because he thought THEY were
wrong. even when that was cleared up, the dumbass showed he knew NOTHING
about basic programming...not bytes, bits, shifting, r g b, compression, not
even imaging itself. even worse, he couldn't even READ the instructions for
what he will/has most likely cookie-cutter pasted into his shitty
application - which is what he OFTEN accuses others of doing. all of his
behavior is just projection. he really can't stand himself...but, who could
blame him.
hey OMH, can you figure out what this applies to?
2^i
hint, it's to do with 256 and 65536. hmmmm...maybe use 8 or 16 for i?
hmmmm...me thinks that with all the instructions given, OMH still has no
idea even what the 8 or the 16 is for. what a goofball.
[Back to original message]
|