Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 01/19/07 21:32

aa wrote:

Please stop top post and trim irrelevant bits.

> Good, now I think we talk the same language
> "list the url to each page with respect to search words" - no need EACH
> page to be listed
> Get just home page to be listed but list high. It is better to have 1 page
> on the first SE page then 10 pages on SE's 10th page

This is rubbish, most SE rank high because of interconnectivity and
quantity of content.

> Pages on a site have different relevance to a subject searched. So indexing
> one the most relevant should suffice. Letting SE going to other pages dilute
> relevance and therefore ranking.

My point is if the links to your "other" pages on your site are inserted
via JavaScript they *will not* be visible to the SE. Result will be
the SE will only see your home page the other page will not be indexed(
processed and ranked).

> Of cource if a SE's algorithm ranks sites basing on the number of pages on
> the site then indeed you need to let him know about the other pages. But
> links to other pages are present in the text of the page outside navigation
> anyway.

If you use JavaScript to manage your site's navigation (CMS) and you
have to hard code duplicate all the links this is hardly efficient!

> Disclaimer. This here post is my personal opinion and as such doe
s not
> preted to be the Most Correct One
> PS. If you do not use JS in navigation could you please refer me to an
> example to such a navigation?

Server-side scripting SSI, PHP includes, ASP includes, MySql or other
database CMS... anything *not* client-side.

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

[Back to original message]