Reply to Re: <header> Validation Problems - Has the W3C Validator Changed?

Your name:

Reply:


Posted by dorayme on 01/22/07 18:13

In article
<1169475751.090620.86190@s34g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote:

> A million thanks to all of you for the reply.
>
> I added that single line of XHTML about 3 weeks ago and totally forgot
> about validation. I do almost everything in XHMTL nowadays and I just
> couldn't sense (at the time) that I was 'mixing'. Speaking of which,
> YouTube and Google Video (among others) are a bummer if you do XHTML,
> which only justifies the claims made by many that XHTML is a bad idea
> from the get-go.
>
> I have corrected the error, I am aware of other design errors in my
> coding (very old page) and again I'd like to thank all of you. The
> error reported by the validator just weren't most informative for
> reasons that Toby explained very well.
>
> Noteworthy is the fact that I kind of miss alt.html. I just don't find
> the time to hang around here anymore.
>
> Best wishes!

I know you don't mean to, but you make people like me look bad by
being so nice. Please stop.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация