Posted by Steve on 01/30/07 14:50

"Kimmo Laine" <spam@outolempi.net> wrote in message
news:dvFvh.154$wj7.21@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
| "comp.lang.php" <phillip.s.powell@gmail.com> wrote in message
| news:1170079350.729027.92780@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
| > php_flag short_open_tag on
|
| and
|
| > the business requirement of these scripts being fully
| > portable installer scripts
|
| ...is just something you can't have. A set of scripts relying on short
open
| tags is not *fully portable*.
|
| Sorry if this doesn't help you, but I just wanted to point out the obvious
| flaw in this situation.

and your obvious lack of reading comprehension skills. he was *describing*
the obvious and how to resolve the short tag problem. you also missed where
he said 'php_flag short_open_tag on' doesn't solve it on all servers...thus,
still not fully portable. if it were, then YES, it would be fully
portable...and it would be something he *COULD* have.

as it is, you only agree with the op that there is a problem. if you cannot
provide a solution, why waste everyone's time. 'captain, there's a hole in
the hull. yes scrub, there is.' a lot of good that does.

moron

[Back to original message]