Posted by Roy A. on 02/01/07 21:54

On 1 Feb, 22:04, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <52eoubF1o707...@mid.individual.net>,
> "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.net> wrote:
>
> > fuli open wrote:
> > > On Feb 1, 7:56 am, "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.net> wrote:
>
> > > I have been doing in my way for years without realizing the difference
> > > between xhtml and html4. It's rather hard for me do otherwise. Is it
> > > possible to change the word 'Strict' to 'Trans ...
> > You can always remove xhtml and use pure html, if you want to use a
> > html-doctype.
>
> Before doing anything, note the wise words of my partner, old K:
>
> "The expert advice is to use HTML 4.01, but you can of course use
> technobabble-XHTML _if_ you are careful enough to follow
> guidelines that effectively make it HTML 4.01 with pointless
> kludges."
>
> Not bad really!

Not bad, but she/he is merely annotating her/his own imagination.

[Back to original message]