Posted by dorayme on 02/01/07 22:17

In article
<1170366856.312820.135400@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Roy A." <royarneskar@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1 Feb, 22:04, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > In article <52eoubF1o707...@mid.individual.net>,
> > "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.net> wrote:
> >
> > > fuli open wrote:
> > > > On Feb 1, 7:56 am, "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > I have been doing in my way for years without realizing the difference
> > > > between xhtml and html4. It's rather hard for me do otherwise. Is it
> > > > possible to change the word 'Strict' to 'Trans ...
> > > You can always remove xhtml and use pure html, if you want to use a
> > > html-doctype.
> >
> > Before doing anything, note the wise words of my partner, old K:
> >
> > "The expert advice is to use HTML 4.01, but you can of course use
> > technobabble-XHTML _if_ you are careful enough to follow
> > guidelines that effectively make it HTML 4.01 with pointless
> > kludges."
> >
> > Not bad really!
>
> Not bad, but she/he is merely annotating her/his own imagination.

No, your "merely" makes it false.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]