Posted by fuli open on 02/02/07 13:20

On Feb 1, 5:17 pm, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article
> <1170366856.312820.135...@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Roy A." <royarnes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 1 Feb, 22:04, dorayme <doraymeRidT...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > > In article <52eoubF1o707...@mid.individual.net>,
> > > "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.net> wrote:
>
> > > > fuli open wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 1, 7:56 am, "J.O. Aho" <u...@example.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > I have been doing in my way for years without realizing the difference
> > > > > between xhtml and html4. It's rather hard for me do otherwise. Is it
> > > > > possible to change the word 'Strict' to 'Trans ...
> > > > You can always remove xhtml and use pure html, if you want to use a
> > > > html-doctype.
>
> > > Before doing anything, note the wise words of my partner, old K:
>
> > > "The expert advice is to use HTML 4.01, but you can of course use
> > > technobabble-XHTML _if_ you are careful enough to follow
> > > guidelines that effectively make it HTML 4.01 with pointless
> > > kludges."
>
> > > Not bad really!
>
> > Not bad, but she/he is merely annotating her/his own imagination.
>
> No, your "merely" makes it false.
>
> --
> dorayme- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Many thanks to all of you for your advice. I would like to go with
either xhtml or html 4.01. The books I've read always say (x)html. So
I think they are same. Could anyone further advise me on the
difference between the two languages, so I can always stay with one.
Or you can recommend a book.

Also, which language do html professionals like better, xhtml or html
4.01? As an amateur, following suit is the best policy.

Thanks again.

[Back to original message]