Posted by TaliesinSoft on 02/15/07 22:00

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:54:47 -0600, Andy Dingley wrote
(in article <1171562087.862571.66030@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>):

> Freeway Pro is a competently implemented page-layout tool using valid HTML
> and CSS. For fixed-pixel layouts it's great, but as a web design tool it
> misses the point entirely and cannot be recommended at all.

If Freeway Express or Freeway Pro are capable of the WYSIWYG production of
webpages to the complete satisfaction of the author then how is it that "it
misses the poiint entirely?" There are undoubtedly nuances in website
creation that are not addressed by Freeway, but unless these nuances are
needed/wanted by the website author than there absence is irrelevant. It is
almost like saying that a piano is a musical instrument that can't be
recommended at all because it can't produce a continuous slide through the
scale as can a violin.

--
James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

[Back to original message]