Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 02/15/07 22:22

TaliesinSoft wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 11:54:47 -0600, Andy Dingley wrote
> (in article <1171562087.862571.66030@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>):
>
>> Freeway Pro is a competently implemented page-layout tool using valid HTML
>> and CSS. For fixed-pixel layouts it's great, but as a web design tool it
>> misses the point entirely and cannot be recommended at all.
>
> If Freeway Express or Freeway Pro are capable of the WYSIWYG production of
> webpages to the complete satisfaction of the author then how is it that "it
> misses the poiint entirely?" There are undoubtedly nuances in website
> creation that are not addressed by Freeway, but unless these nuances are
> needed/wanted by the website author than there absence is irrelevant. It is
> almost like saying that a piano is a musical instrument that can't be
> recommended at all because it can't produce a continuous slide through the
> scale as can a violin.
>
Give them credit that unlike MS they actually use their software to
built their site! That said, neither impressed with the output of their
site nor their gallery of sites. Agree with Andy here....

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com

[Back to original message]