Posted by dorayme on 02/19/07 21:23

In article <7e8b2$45d9b64c$40cba7c6$28294@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:

> Travis Newbury wrote:
> > On Feb 16, 6:37 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@centralva.net>
> > wrote:
> >> Just did a TABLEless design example for another thread that may help:
> >> http://www.littleworksstudio.com/temp/usenet/alt.html.20070216.php
> >
> > I hate black and white images of the Grand Canyon. It completely
> > loses its magic. (Actually I hate images of it at all as they can
> > never even begin to capture the canyon.)
> >
> Oooooooookay....but what does that have to do with the HTML?

Looks like a bit of stuff is not coming to my newsreader.

So Travis said this eh?

Well, Travis, for your information, a good photograph "of the
Grand Canyon" is not trying to capture the canyon. This is a
naive idea about pictures and representative art generally. A
good artistic photograph is something in itself and is not a
travel poster to give you some information on what a treat you
are in for if you visit the "real" thing. Nor is it a substitute
for the real thing, more convenient to visit or have.

To begin to understand what I am telling you, you might need to
concentrate first on bromide prints made from original negatives.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]