Posted by TaliesinSoft on 02/20/07 02:43

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:13:35 -0600, dorayme wrote
(in article <doraymeRidThis-997629.09133520022007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>):

> I agree that your site is simple enough to justify to some extent, your
> confidence in it. But what I am saying and what others are suggesting to you
> will more and more come into its own as you make other sites. The approach
> you are taking will become to have more severe limitations as you contemplate

> more website pages and sites.

I'll accept that there are things that Freeway Pro cannot do in terms of
describing a website, but I'll also state that the number of times I have
felt constrained are few. Freeway Pro is not a static application and as time
progresses so will Freeway in terms of its capabilities. But what I consider
most important of all is that Freeway allows me to work in a manner in which
I am comfortable, working visually instead of technically. And, a nice aspect
of working with such as Freeway is that if a new release arrives with better
code generation all I need to do is to re upload my websites to take
advantage of it.

> Screens really do have a very diverse range of sizes and setting out there...

> quite aside from the extremes.

There are indeed a variety of screen sizes in use, but according to the
latest statistics some 80% of computers in use today have a resolution
appropriate for my Adams site, appropriate in the sense that horizontal
scrolling is not be necessary.

--
James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

[Back to original message]