|
Posted by TaliesinSoft on 02/20/07 04:39
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:26:50 -0600, Jonathan N. Little wrote
(in article <9b7ad$45da6a61$40cba7ab$14957@NAXS.COM>):
> You espouse such virtue of this software, but neither your site nor any that
> the software publisher promotes in their gallery demonstrates that it
> shortcomings shared by all WYSIWYG editors. It is just not that good.
> Obviously you have fallen in love with it but it does not produce very good
> markup.
To be honest, I don't care what's under the skin, but I care greatly that the
end user, a user using one of many browsers with their default settings, can
view my site as I intended it to be seen.
--
James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com
[Back to original message]
|