Posted by Ed Mullen on 02/20/07 14:48

TaliesinSoft wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:26:50 -0600, Jonathan N. Little wrote
> (in article <9b7ad$45da6a61$40cba7ab$14957@NAXS.COM>):
>
>> You espouse such virtue of this software, but neither your site nor any that
>> the software publisher promotes in their gallery demonstrates that it
>> shortcomings shared by all WYSIWYG editors. It is just not that good.
>> Obviously you have fallen in love with it but it does not produce very good
>> markup.
>
> To be honest, I don't care what's under the skin, but I care greatly that the
> end user, a user using one of many browsers with their default settings, can
> view my site as I intended it to be seen.
>

Understood. And I wouldn't necessarily argue with you in this case.
However, even knowing what screen resolution a visitor is using tells
you nothing about the actual size of the page view pane. For instance,
I use 1280 x 1024, my browser is always maximized. Here is how my
browser is virtually always visually configured:

http://edmullen.net/temp/cap01.jpg

As you can see, even with the higher than average resolution I use the
actual available page pane size requires horizontal scrolling with your
design. A design where the thumbnails flow without requiring hor
scrolling would be better for me.

Beautiful photos, by the way.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
http://mozilla.edmullen.net
http://abington.edmullen.net
Assphasia- a condition where your face looks so much like your butt your
bowels don't know which way to move.

[Back to original message]