Posted by Jim S on 02/27/07 20:07

On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:35:56 +0100, Bernhard Sturm wrote:

>>>
>>> cheers
>>> bernhard
>>
>> Below as always. :o)
>
> oh sorry... didn't know that this was the URL in question. Looking at
> your site (http://www.jimscott.co.uk/), I would indeed use tables in
> order to organise your images. This looks like 'tabular data' to me,
> hence I wouldn't have any trouble using a mixed layout-technique
> (table/div) for your entry page.
> but I would drop the frames on your subpages. A frameless layout has the
> priceless advantage of being more accessible (printing, bookmarking is
> easier and search engines love frameless layouts). A frameless layout
> combined with server-side-includes makes the maintenance of a website
> easier, too.
>
> But you don't need to "die in beauty" (direct translation of a German
> proverb), so I wouldn't bother to change a thing. The site works for
> you, and you are obviously not aiming at winning the
> accessibility-award, so go for it, and you're better off by investing
> your time in taking more pictures, because content matters :-)

Thank you for that.
I get the feeling of being a 'dog in a church' in this newsgroup sometimes.
Now all I have to do is look up "server-side-includes" in my old-boys book
of magic.
--
Jim S
Tyneside UK
http://www.jimscott.co.uk

[Back to original message]