Posted by Paul on 03/01/07 15:08

"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:c7986$45e6e6ce$40cba7be$8043@NAXS.COM...
> Paul wrote:
>> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> ha scritto nel messaggio
>> news:doraymeRidThis-730641.08144801032007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
>
> For many 800x600 is not low resolution but *their* resolution. Secondly
> how are you getting this statistic 7%? Are you basing it on screen
> resolution or browser windows size? You are making a fundamental error
> that folks always have their browser window maximize!

Well, I have seen it on my visitor counters:
it is this:
Screen Resolutions Unique Visitors

1280x1024 642 47.45%
1024x768 499 36.88%
800x600 95 7.02%
1152x864 41 3.03%
Other 34 2.51%
1400x1050 18 1.33%
1440x900 12 0.89%
1680x1050 6 0.44%
1600x1200 4 0.30%
1920x1200 1 0.07%
640x480 1 0.07%

>> Luigi? No, I don't know any Luigi...., really.
>
> We all want to forget Luigi, really.

Surely I have lost something funny (??) with him...
Paul

[Back to original message]