Posted by dorayme on 03/01/07 19:34

In article <45e6a2a5$0$20806$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it>,
"Paul" <orelieteNOSPAM@NOSPAMtiscali.it> wrote:

> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:doraymeRidThis-730641.08144801032007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> > In article <45e56746$0$7739$5fc30a8@news.tiscali.it>,
> > "Paul" <orelieteNOSPAM@NOSPAMtiscali.it> wrote:
> > >> I have compressed thumbnails images using ACDSee. It' s easy and very
> > >> fast.
> >> Paul (from Italy)
> >
> > The thumbnail sizes are fine here for your purposes. But there is
> > trouble with your design.
>
> Oh yes, I have seen. Thank you to let me note it.
> The fact is that it only happens with low resolution screens 800x600,
> and
> that type of visitors to my website are only about 7% of total.
> Anyway I will correct it.

I have a 20" 1600 * 1200 (as well as other connected screens.
making a virtual desktop of much more) And yet still it is
sometimes convenient to reduce browser size to 800 across or
thereabouts. My point? Does this sort of thing get covered by the
7% you mention?

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]