|
Posted by dorayme on 03/05/07 22:26
In article
<NikitaTheSpider-2A6316.11301905032007@news-server.nc.rr.com>,
Nikita the Spider <NikitaTheSpider@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article <0001HW.C2117CCB010B26B4B042494F@News.Individual.Net>,
> patrick j <usemywebsite@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 4, 2007 dorayme wrote:
> >
> > > We had a thread a while back in which Spider Monkey gave some
> > > impressive results of personal trials using encoding etc and no
> > > one really challenged the fact that various masking techniques
> > > were quite effective in practice.
> >
> > Yes, I recall that thread. Was it Spider Monkey however who did the tests?
>
> Ahem, it was Nikita the Spider. =)
>
Sorry Spider! I was conflating the names of two characters on
different ngs! But the point remains, of course. That for
practical purposes it is not too bad an idea to mask email
addresses.
--
dorayme
[Back to original message]
|