Posted by Rik on 03/09/07 00:57

>>>> Hmmmz, a CMS is a real time-saver.
>>> Also, an seo killer, see
>>> www.kruse.co.uk/content-management-systems.htm
>>
>> Depends highly on the CMS in use.
>
> Agreed.
>
>> 11 of the 12 points do not apply to my own brand of CMS on that list,
>
> Agreed.
>
> The very first point actually IMHO supports the use of a CMS. "The
> content
> that you can manage is the on-page text". That is what CMS means. Content
> management. Not web page management. Leave web page management (and SEO)
> to
> the web designer. Leave the content management to the client.

Hmmmz, while that may be some definition of CMS I do not agree that it
shouldn't be altered. While most clients trust me enough to set things up
correctly, some may want to change some things. Close to total managment
of the site has to be possible. Anything that can be in a HTML document or
in the URL has be editable.

--
Rik Wasmus
Posted on Usenet, not any forum you might see this in.
Ask Smart Questions: http://tinyurl.com/anel

[Back to original message]