Posted by Big Bill on 03/09/07 15:45

On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:27:27 GMT, Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Gazing into my crystal ball I observed Big Bill <bill@kruse.co.uk>
>writing in news:u351v25u60cmj59i05rrmofehvhifseclo@4ax.com:
>
>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:04:43 +0100, Rik <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>tonnie <t.prasinge@chello.nl> wrote:
>>>> Why a cms? Total overkill as it looks now. Use the time to teach her
>>>> how to place content in HTML!
>>>
>>>Hmmmz, a CMS is a real time-saver.
>>
>> Also, an seo killer, see
>> www.kruse.co.uk/content-management-systems.htm
>>
>> BB
>
>As others have said, it depends on the CMS. I set up a quasi CMS for
>Holy Family. They can only edit pages that have "iseditable" in the db,
>and then, they can only edit within the <div id="content">...</div>.
>The H1 is done programatically, and they do not have access to it.
>
>I made this CMS for them, and it's dead easy to use, but, for some
>reason, they still send me edits, and I get paid for it, so what the
>hey, eh?

Heh-heh!

BB :-)
--

http://www.kruse.co.uk/internet-marketing-small-business.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/google-mountain.htm
http://www.kruse.co.uk/seo-tips.htm

[Back to original message]