Posted by Kevin Scholl on 04/02/07 00:53

dorayme wrote:

> PS has traditionally been better for photo manipulations. Yes, FW
> has a lot of tools but it is not as easy for many things as PS
> (the actual steps for many manipulations are awkward). FW is good
> for moving bits around (esp. on the same layer!), sizing
> elements, generally organising an image, especially a complex one
> and above all fabulous in exporting smallish files (PS is
> hopeless on this, even the awkward "web sister" program
> ImageReady is not so impressive)

Could you elaborate, please. Where exactly do these other applications
hold any significant advantage over PS/IM when exporting "smallish" files?

--

*** Remove the DELETE from my address to reply ***

======================================================
Kevin Scholl http://www.ksscholl.com/
kscholl@comcast.DELETE.net
------------------------------------------------------
Information Architecture, Web Design and Development
------------------------------------------------------
We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of
the dreams...
======================================================

[Back to original message]