Posted by aljones on 04/04/07 02:36

dorayme wrote:
> In article <H_AQh.231775$Md3.18933@fe01.news.easynews.com>,
> aljones <al@shotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Mostly because I'd really like to have the footer appear after
>> everything else on the page. It looks really odd (to me) for the footer
>> on a page which has short content to fall under the content without
>> falling under the nav bar as well.
>
> Well, it does not matter. It is a line containing a bit of
> information in small print. And it is at the bottom of your main
> content. It is no big deal. People get very quickly used to the
> style within a site as long as it is consistent and sensible.
>
Were it consistently there I'd agree, it might look a bit odd but it
would be consistent. As it was, pages which had more content than the
navbar put the footer 'where it belonged' (under both of them); pages
which had less content, put it only under the content pain <sic!>

[Back to original message]