Posted by BootNic on 04/09/07 13:23

> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> news: doraymeRidThis-03DC86.15095409042007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au
> In article
> <AEiSh.19700$PL.9488@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
> "BootNic" <bootnic@bounce.earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>>> news: doraymeRidThis-3F37C7.12262309042007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au
>>> [snip] Righto, I have now incorporated Bootnic's js into the design
>>> because it looked promising on Bootnic's url in Window IE.
>
>> If you're not using a border the it should be fine without the
>> overflow, or you could change it to hidden to remove the scroll bars.
>>
>
>
> Just another note to add, I have found that using your original
> js, (unaltered by me) with the new wrapper css is also good for
> Safari re scrollbars; in other words, longer do I get unwanted
> scrollbars with the original js now in Safari.

Safari has an issue with the float, I have not been successful in
researching it, a float that contains floats, does not seem to shrink. I
do not have access to Safari, so this is just a guess from the little
information I was able to find, and what appeared to be the case from
browserShots.

That is the part of the script that was added to compare a caudated width
with a float with.

Currently the script checks both all the time, the script could be greatly
improved if someone with Safari would be able to create a quick test
for the float width issue and save that in a variable, and then use just one
method or the other to do the centering.

--
BootNic Monday, April 09, 2007 9:23 AM

One must learn by doing the thing, for though you think you know it,
you have no certainty until you try.
*Aristotle*

[Back to original message]