|
|
Posted by Mimic on 07/02/05 00:26
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:16:28 +0100, Mimic <dev@null.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Peter wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:53:13 +0100, in alt.2600 Mimic
>>><dev@null.net> quoth:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Peter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On 29 Jun 2005 23:19:46 GMT, in alt.2600 ByteCoder
>>>>><me@none.com> quoth:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Peter <peter_hood@ausi.com> wrote in
>>>>>>news:efa6c1d09jd7l95vre51bib8o21trea2rr@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 29 Jun 2005 23:00:49 GMT, in alt.2600 ByteCoder
>>>>>>><me@none.com> quoth:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>bny <tidepool@suspicious.org> wrote in
>>>>>>>>news:42C3207C.9020205@suspicious.org:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>you may be able to 'hand code' but sine both of your pages look like
>>>>>>>>>absolute shit, does it matter that they are 'hand coded'?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Cut off your nose to spite your face.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>People (in general) don't look at the code that creates a
>>>>>>>>>layout/page, they look at what their browser renders. If your
>>>>>>>>>Frontpage/Dreamweaver code renders nice and cleanly, then why give a
>>>>>>>>>flying fuck if a WYSIWYG editor is used...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-bny
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because especially the people with a slower internet connection also
>>>>>>>>look at the speed of rendering.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There are some handy tools for stripping out redundant
>>>>>>>'code'.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yeah, by writing it correctly the first time around...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>:p
>>>>>
>>>>>Some of us are either lazy or too busy to learn to do it
>>>>>properly. I can't imagine doing it without having fairly
>>>>>fast feedback on the look and feel of it but, there again,
>>>>>things have moved on at a smart pace since I last did a web
>>>>>site, a few years ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>I am sorting things out though. I have to remedy the
>>>>>situation soon.
>>>>
>>>>ctrl-S , alt-tab , f5 ;P
>>>
>>>
>>>LOL. I remember the windows macro recorder. When it went I
>>>too internalised stuff.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>TBH I dont get on with WYSIWYGs, took me ages to find the bgcolor button
>>>>in DW, so I used to get pissed off and open notepad :P I only use DW
>>>>now for complex data tables.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Well I used to use a variety of editors anyhow, because each
>>>seems to have a function not found in the others.
>>>
>>>That includes Arachnophilia <Sp?>, Dreamweaver, Claris, and
>>>the Symantec one that always escapes memory, plus <very
>>>occasionally!> the one bundled with Win 98. I've got a
>>>couple of text editors that know html. They seem to be
>>>popular.
>>
>>All you need is notepad/pico and a browser :P
>>Although Ive started using DevPHP recently for PHP, as I was impressed
>>with DevC++
>
>
> Doing PHP in just Notepad is a lil more of a pain in the ass because
> you have to actually upload everything after making changes in order
> to test it.
>
> --
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.backwater-productions.net
Yeah, well I usually develope on my windows box, then upload to my nix
server in texas, I prefer the whole GUI setup or dev, and its fairly
quick. The only downer to pic/notepad is its lack of colored syntax,
never really bothered me before, but now Im using DevPHP2 for the
projects and notepad for quick scripts. (these "proper" programs always
took too long to load up for me)
--
Mimic
"I can speak to people anywhere in the world, I can get any information
I want, I can goto new zealand in 0.384 seconds, why would I want to go
outside?"
Damn the day star and its rays of light beaming upon my box of moving
pictures.
ZGF0YWZsZXhAY2FubmFiaXNtYWlsLmNvbQ== [ www.hidemyemail.net ]
[Back to original message]
|