Posted by Ben C on 04/17/07 22:04

On 2007-04-17, Albert Wiersch <donotreply@123donotreply123.com> wrote:
>
> "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote in message
> news:hRaVh.53663$VU4.13254@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> Albert Wiersch wrote:
>>
>>> CSE HTML Validator doesn't claim pages to be "valid". ...
>>
>> Well! Then why do you name it CSE HTML *Validator* ?
>
> Because it finds problems in web pages, which is what people want when they
> look for a validator.
>
>>
>> Suggest you change its name to:
>>
>> CSE HTML Simply-Finds-Potential-Issues-Based-On-Real-World-Browsers.
>
> I think that's a bit too long. :-)

Something like "HTML Lint" would be the traditional name for such a
tool.

[Back to original message]