Posted by Peter on 11/26/66 11:20

On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 12:30:42 -0700, in alt.2600 Onideus Mad
Hatter <usenet@backpassage-productions.net> quoth:

>On Sun, 03 Jul 2005 19:14:49 +0100, Peter <peter_hood@ausi.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:41:22 -0700, in alt.2600 Onideus Mad
>>Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> quoth:
>>
>>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:36:37 +0100, Peter <peter_hood@ausi.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:11:57 -0700, in alt.2600 Onideus Mad
>>>>Hatter <usenet@backwater-productions.net> quoth:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:10:57 +0100, Peter <peter_hood@ausi.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:54:13 +0100, in alt.2600 Mimic
>>>>>><dev@null.net> quoth:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Peter wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 29 Jun 2005 23:00:49 GMT, in alt.2600 ByteCoder
>>>>>>>> <me@none.com> quoth:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>bny <tidepool@suspicious.org> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>news:42C3207C.9020205@suspicious.org:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>you may be able to 'hand code' but sine both of your pages look like
>>>>>>>>>>absolute shit, does it matter that they are 'hand coded'?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Cut off your nose to spite your face.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>People (in general) don't look at the code that creates a layout/page,
>>>>>>>>>>they look at what their browser renders. If your Frontpage/Dreamweaver
>>>>>>>>>>code renders nice and cleanly, then why give a flying fuck if a
>>>>>>>>>>WYSIWYG editor is used...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>-bny
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Because especially the people with a slower internet connection also
>>>>>>>>>look at the speed of rendering.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are some handy tools for stripping out redundant
>>>>>>>> 'code'.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You shouldnt need to strip out redundant code ;)
>>>>>>>time is money, time is money ....or so they say :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>>LOL. I think that you'd be surprised at how compressed it
>>>>>>becomes. Also, the stuff I used did batches. So I used to
>>>>>>finish up the day, hit batch processing, and start cooking
>>>>>>dinner. Probably done by the time I'd got to the oven.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As to redundant code, well it's not as bad as your
>>>>>>description of 4 pages of it!
>>>>>
>>>>>The kind of editors you're talking about are really only good for
>>>>>generating markup la^HA^HA^HA^HA BIG FUCKING SLAPPP!!
>>>
>>>>You are a simpleton, without out a doubt.
>>>
>>>Do you suppose the barely coherent opinion of a retard like you means
>>>anything to me other than CHEAP entertainment?
>>
>>This n<STFU>
>
>I'm thowwy but I can't take it any mower an I won't wethpond to enny
>futhwer thpanking fwom you an I'm gonn thnip your wemarks out of
>cowardithe. If you cwitithe me in futuwe I will do the thame ower
>I will ignower you. Neeener.

Par for the course Baby Matthew, and I fully expected you to
respond like the spankard that you are.

After all, you are the spankard that contests the privacy
implications of a language that you explicitly use in your
web pages.

Do some research, try to stay on topic on the matter of
security awareness in a hacking newsgroup.

Oh, good night and I'll see you in about a week, Baby
Matthew.

> --
>
>Onideus Mad Hatter
>mhm ¹ x ¹
>http://www.backpassage-productions.net

--
Peter
Mine is my freedom
you take I'll defy

laugh 'til I'm tired
sing 'til I'm dry

'cos life is a moment
you pass with a sigh

never comes back sure
as yesterday's bye....

<From "In my own time", by Family>

[Back to original message]