Posted by Steve on 04/23/07 22:55

"Gordon Burditt" <gordonb.jrxmo@burditt.org> wrote in message
news:132qcnc3gtjuke0@corp.supernews.com...
| >> data is in the db. a query will return the correct step that is next in
the
| >> ladder of steps to get to the top. user logs back in, that step is
| >> displayed. now, pray-tell, HOW IS THE DATA LOST?
| >>
| >>
| >
| >And your mind is completely unable to grasp a simple concept. If the
| >session is lost and there is no user login, there is no way to reference
| >the row in the table related to this user.
| >
| >You have 500 users currently active. Suddenly one of them loses a
| >session. Now - WHICH OF THOSE FIVE HUNDRED ROWS IS RELATED TO THAT
| >USER? THERE IS NOT LOGIN!
|
| His solution to that is to display 500 credit card numbers and names
| and addresses, mostly of other people, and let the user choose his.

you can't make a good argument when you mix context scenarios. you know my
architecture holds more merit than sessioning ESPECIALLY IN THIS CASE. first
THERE WILL BE A LOGIN. second, I CAN HIJACK SESSIONS. you wanna continue
arguing your case now?!!!

| Even without privacy and security issues, it sounds a lot easier
| to just start over, or better, go to a different web site run by a
| different company entirely.

you've lost credibility with me now, as you cannot state a case much less
back it up.

ROFLMAO.

[Back to original message]