Posted by dorayme on 04/25/07 04:45

In article
<doraymeRidThis-6993A5.14411525042007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

> In article
> <1177475130.733503.148480@b40g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
> corrinarusso@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I hate it personally - so my question is :
> > What sort of *techncial argument* can I make in trying to justify why
> > __not__ to implement this ?
> > Is there anything *in addition* to the fact that the user must have
> > javascript enabled for it to work ?
> >
> > Ultimately - it's his money, and his site, but I'd like to have
> > another side to discuss other than I just don't like it!
>
> Are you kidding? You just "don't like it" is the best you can do?
> What technical argument, the bloody thing stops you reading
> content stuff underneath it on a short window? That is enough.
> Tell them you organised a trial with a room full of people and
> they split their sides.

If I may add, it not only blocks content on a short window, it
trips over itself at very few up-text clicks.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]