Posted by dorayme on 04/26/07 00:04

In article <5RPXh.43509$Fz3.14261@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi>,
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:

> Now please excuse me white I fetch my asbestos suit and prepare to getting
> flamed for recommending "tables for layout".

Ah, but, earlier in your post, you gave a previous argument as to
why there was a table-relationship in all this so it is not
purely a layout issue. <g>

Ages ago I gave an argument (in response to Jonathan Little which
no doubt very few if any would have understood or appreciated) to
show that there _was_ a tabular relationship between a side
navigation column and a right content column when taking account
the website as a whole and not merely an individual page. When
one finds it convenient to use a table, it is not too hard to
find arguments. I thought yours not too bad. I still think mine
was good.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]