Posted by dorayme on 05/01/07 23:06

In article
<alPZh.94909$VU4.25285@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote:

> In alt.html, dorayme wrote:
>
> > In article <46375460$0$20597$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>,
> > Leif K-Brooks <eurleif@ecritters.biz> wrote:
> >
> >> for free; for example, QuickCaptcha:
> >> <http://www.web1marketing.com/resources/tools/quickcaptcha/>.
> >
> > I have been waiting for a link like this for ages. Always meaning
> > to investigate it. Thanks for posting this, Leif.
>
> Is the sample on that page supposed to work? I tried at least a dozen
> different 'Submits', after refreshing the page each time and getting a
> new image. Always the answer, "You entered an incorrect code." ..and my
> eyes are pretty good.
>
> They are extremely hard to read; I'd never use it on my sites.

mmm... it is a point! Some of them _are_ hard to read, I agree.
Most I have little trouble.

My guess for

<http://members.optushome.com.au/droovies/test/pics/captcha.gif>

is:

1. 7C2CR

2. 9NSW1

3. J7B4D

4. PJ9FK (this one is really too hard!)

So more care is needed I guess in the construction of these
things, but the idea is pretty good as far as I can see?

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]