Posted by dorayme on 05/07/07 22:31

In article <Xns992980D064B2Bnanopandaneredbojias@208.49.80.251>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 06 May 2007 02:32:52 GMT dorayme scribed:
>
> >> Yes, I understood it; I just don't buy it.
> >
> > You understood it not at all. Just look at the data (facts) on a
> > well used serious computer and there are no end of them. Do their
> > sheer numbers help anyone when it comes down to answering
> > something for which it is not obvious which ones help? Let me
> > help you: no, they help not at all and are often a confusing
> > distraction. To answer many questions that are interesting, one
> > needs to think hard what sort of facts are needed. And only then,
> > to search for such.
>
> Hmm, I'd say this is one of those cases that we'll just have to agree to
> disagree. Of course, I highly suspect you'll be averse to agreeing even
> with that, but to disagree to disagree presents an obvious dilemma. On
> the brighter side, though, some women seem to handle it perfectly.
>

Yes, you are right. I don't agree with this at all. You make it
sound as if you have some feint idea what I am talking about but
disagree. Which is not at all the case.

> >
> > I am going to ask JK and Officer White to have a little word to
> > you. JK will do the talking and "Bud" will do other things more
> > in keeping with his natural talents.
>
> Btw, I re-saw "LA Confidental" a couple weeks ago, and there's no
> question about it: I could kick Bud White's ass from here to New
> Zealand. He may be enthusiastic, but size counts.

You mean like the big guy that came lumbering out of the xmas lit
house towards the beginning of the film? Don't make the silly
mistake of confusing Officer White with some NZ actor. That could
be a very costly mistake for you boyo...

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]