Posted by dorayme on 05/09/07 21:45

In article <Xns992B1C17AE881nanopandaneredbojias@208.49.80.251>,
Neredbojias <neredbojias@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 07 May 2007 22:31:45 GMT dorayme scribed:
>
> >> Hmm, I'd say this is one of those cases that we'll just have to agree to
> >> disagree. Of course, I highly suspect you'll be averse to agreeing even
> >> with that, but to disagree to disagree presents an obvious dilemma. On
> >> the brighter side, though, some women seem to handle it perfectly.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, you are right. I don't agree with this at all. You make it
> > sound as if you have some feint idea what I am talking about but
> > disagree. Which is not at all the case.
>
> Oh, so it'd be better if I really did have no idea at all of what you're
> talking about but agreed wholeheartedly? Geesh! Btw, don't you know how
> to spell "faint"?

You reason like I imagine Daffy Duck would. Let me explain. There
is Aristotle... and then there is Daffy Duck.

What would be better than not knowing what I am talking about
would be you do know and disagree. You left this one out. So
don't you be going around geeshing me, Boji. <g>

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]