Posted by NoWhereMan on 05/15/07 11:14

On 14 May 2007 15:02:01 -0700, ZeldorBlat wrote:

> I replaced 10 with 100000 and ran each function through a profiler.
> The first one (using concatenation) was approximately 25% faster than
> the one using implode().

nice :)

Could you please repeat the test with a long string isntead of $i?
maybe a $str .= str_pad($i, 10^10 , "___"); so that you have a very long
string? of course not a $str .= "My very long long string"; because the
literal may be evaluated only once, and multi-referenced in the join()
version, resulting in a quicker computation (I think...)

bye


--
NoWhereMan (e.v.)
-- http://www.nowhereland.it
-- http://flatpress.nowhereland.it

[Back to original message]