Posted by El Kabong on 05/28/07 03:27

"dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:doraymeRidThis-8B01D8.07220728052007@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <f3cfia$2ob$00$1@news.t-online.com>,
> Knut Krueger <knut.krueger@usa.com> wrote:
>
>> Jukka K. Korpela schrieb:
>>
>> > Ceterum censeo: most authors gain nothing but confusion by using XHTML
>> > instead of good old HTML 4.01.
>> >
>> Anything what's not working with 4.01?
>
> A lot more things will not work, on average, for now if you don't
> use 4.01

Out of curiosity, is there _ever_ a good reason to go to the trouble of
using XHTML? Are there some example pages that just wouldn't work if they
weren't done in XHTML?

El

[Back to original message]