|
|
Posted by 2obvious on 05/28/07 21:09
On May 24, 3:01 pm, 2obvious <EverettLind...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 23, 9:55 am, "Jim Carlock" <anonym...@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Benjamin wrote:
> > > Sorry about all the postings. I kept getting an error and retrying...
> > "Jerry Stuckle" wrote:
>
> > : Glad to hear I'm not the only one with that problem :-)
>
> > Does it seem like it occurs more often through Google as opposed
> > to employing a news-reader. Does anyone know if Google provides
> > a way to read groups through newsgroup messaging?
>
> > As for the OPs question...
>
> >http://www.tiddlywiki.com/http://shared.snapgrid.com/(GTDTiddlyWiki) {old, no longer supported}http://15black.bluedepot.com/twtests/tiddlywikise.htmStudentEdition (TiddlyWiki-SE)http://newshutch.com/(NewsSmashup)
>
> > I haven't had time to explore the content of those links, other than
> > taking a quick look at how they visibly work. But source code
> > comes through the first link. Frank Kotler recently set up his own
> > thing through a Verizon connection... He's not much into HTML
> > or javascript but he did a fairly nice job playing around with it for
> > a couple of hours. It's possible that Verizon doesn't provide write
> > access, or perhaps, Frank disabled write access.
>
> >http://mysite.verizon.net/fbkotler/ezasm.html
>
> > Hope this helps.
>
> > --
> > Jim Carlock
> > Post replies to the group.
>
> Tiddly Wiki has quite a learning curve to it. But it is interesting.
> And it looks like it will serve the purpose. (I'm hesitant that folks
> will find the UI too daunting to contribute. We'll see how it goes.)
>
> Thanks, Jim.
>
> --E.
Unfortunately, the server side adaptations of Tiddly Wiki were too
unreliable.
I took a shot at Benjamin's recommendation: MediaWiki. After a few
days I uncovered <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:POP">Lupin's
Navigational popup script</a>, which is precisely the sort of thing I
was looking for. It's going to take some tweaking, but given the
overwhelming popularity of MediaWiki, this is a better foundation for
a longterm site.
Thanks for the help, everybody!
--E.
[Back to original message]
|