Posted by Stewart Gordon on 07/08/05 14:20

Neredbojias wrote:
> With neither quill nor qualm, WCB quothed
<snip>
>> The question is, has anybody figured out about what % are
>> not frames capable?
>
> As for browsers-in-use, I'd say less than 1%. All even halfway-modern
> graphical browsers anyone's ever heard of support frames.

Try telling Sagem that the web browser built into my mobile phone is a
decade out of date, and that it should be ignoring the fact that framed
layouts don't work well on such a small screen.

And notice also your own words: _graphical_ browsers. OK, so there's no
real reason browsers like Lynx and Braille devices can't be made to
support frames, but the concept doesn't make much sense to a speech
synthesiser....

Stewart.

--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K- w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y?
PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox. Please keep replies on
the 'group where everyone may benefit.

[Back to original message]