Posted by dorayme on 06/07/07 07:00

In article <m2vee0s3dh.fsf@local.wv-www.com>,
Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.org> wrote:

> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> writes:
>
> > In article <m23b14tjs9.fsf@local.wv-www.com>,
> > Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Adrienne Boswell <arbpen@yahoo.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > I suggested use is misspellings of common words. For a long time, I
> >> > could not spell affidavit correctly (heck who's kidding who, I still
> >> > have
> >> > to look it up), so one could put common misspellings for keywords.
> >>
> >> Google's "Did you mean: ..." feature makes that a more or less moot point.
> >>
> >
> > er...
>
> I take that to mean that I didn't make it clear just *how* that makes this
> point moot. :-)
>
> If you search Google

It was that I thought it odd to suppose the point was to use meta
tags as a spellcheck. Suely it was to not let a spelling error in
a search field keep folk from the site concerned (on the
assumption, never mind its truth) that meta tags drove search
engines to some extent or some do or did.

--
dorayme

[Back to original message]